AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sumi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, T.

Discrimination of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Misa Sumia, Noriyuki Sakihamab, Tadateru Sumia, Minoru Morikawac, Masataka Uetanic, Hiroyuki Kabasawad, Koichiro Shigenob, Kuniaki Hayashic, Haruo Takahashib and Takashi Nakamuraa

a Department of Radiology and Cancer Biology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry
b Departments of Otorhinolaryngology
c Radiology
d Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan; and General Electric Yokogawa Medical Systems, Hino, Japan



View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. 66-year-old woman with well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of lower gingiva.

A, Axial T1-weighted MR image of metastatic submandibular node (arrow) shows homogeneous intermediate signal intensity.

B, Axial T2-weighted, fat-suppressed MR image of the same metastatic node shows focal hyperintensity in the node (arrow).

C, Axial fat-suppressed, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows a nonenhanced area in the node (arrow).



View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. 34-year-old man with benign lymphadenopathy (lymphoid hyperplasia) of the bilateral jugulodigastric nodes.

A, Axial T1-weighted MR image shows homogeneous (except for hilum signal intensity) nodes (arrows).

B, Axial T2-weighted MR image shows homogeneous nodes (arrows).

C, Axial fat-suppressed, gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows homogeneously enhanced (except for hilum signal intensity) nodes (arrows).



View larger version (58K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of maxilla.

A, Axial T2-weighted MR image of metastatic buccinator node (arrow) shows a large, hyperintense necrotic area.

B, Axial diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR image, at b factor of 500 s/mm2, of metastatic node (arrow) shows hyperintensity of the node.

C, Axial diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR image, at b factor of 1000 s/mm2, of metastatic node (arrow) shows nodal signal intensity with a central hypointense area. A large reduction in signal intensity on the image at b 1000 s/mm2 compared with the image at b 500 s/mm2 results in an elevated ADC (0.410 x 10-3 mm2/s).



View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. 20-year-old man with benign lymphadenopathy in neck.

A, Axial T2-weighted MR image shows an inflammatory jugulodigastric node (arrow) with homogeneous signal intensity.

B, Axial diffusion-weighted MR image at b factor of 500 s/mm2 of benign lymphadenopathy (arrow) shows homogeneous hyperintensity.

C, Axial diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR image at b factor of 1000 s/mm2 of benign lymphadenopathy (arrow) shows a defined area of hyperintensity. An intermediate reduction in signal intensity on the image at b 1000 s/mm2 compared with the image at b 500 s/mm2 results in a moderate ADC (0.335 x 10-3 mm2/s).



View larger version (63K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. 56-year-old woman with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

A, Axial T2-weighted MR image shows lymphoma in jugulodigastric node (arrow) with homogeneous signal intensity.

B, Axial diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR image at b factor of 500 s/mm2 of nodal lymphoma (arrow) shows hyperintensity.

C, Axial diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR image at b factor of 1000 s/mm2 of nodal lymphoma (arrow) shows a defined area of hyperintensity. A small reduction in signal intensity on the image at b 1000 s/mm2 compared with the image at b 500 s/mm2 results in a low ADC (0.258 x 10-3 mm2/s).



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 6. Graph (box plots) shows ADCs of metastatic nodes, nodal lymphomas, and nodes with benign lymphadenopathy. The horizontal line is a median (50th percentile) of the measured values, the top and bottom of the box represent 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and whiskers indicate the range from the largest to smallest observed data points within 1.5 interquartile range presented by the box. Note that ADCs of metastatic nodes are significantly higher than those of nodes with benign lymphadenopathy (P < .01, Mann-Whitney U test).



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 7. Graph (box plots) shows ADCs of poorly differentiated and of moderately or highly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas metastasized to cervical lymph nodes. Note that ADCs of metastatic nodes from poorly differentiated cancers are significantly lower than those from moderately or highly differentiated cancers (P < .01, Mann-Whitney U test).



View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 8. Photomicrographs show metastatic lymph nodes from poorly (A) and highly (B) differentiated squamous cell carcinomas.

A, Poorly differentiated cancer cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios are densely packed in metastatic node.

B, Highly differentiated cancer cells are loosely packed, and amorphous materials (*), probably produced by cancer cells, and fibrous tissues (**) are frequently observed. (Hematoxylin and eosin, original magnification x200)



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 9. Graph shows averaged ROC curves for MR diagnostic criteria by using ADC or internal architectural abnormality (abnormal signal intensity) of nodes. Az values calculated from ROC curves indicate that diagnostic ability using either of these criteria are at similar levels: Az value (ADC) = 0.8440 ± 0.0538, and Az value (abnormal signal intensity) = 0.8437 ± 0.0230.