AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rappard, G.
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rappard, G.
Right arrow Articles by Purdy, P. D.

Interventional MR Imaging with an Endospinal Imaging Coil: Preliminary Results with Anatomic Imaging of the Canine and Cadaver Spinal Cord

George Rapparda,b, Gregory J. Metzgera,c, Paul T. Weatheralla,b,c,d and Phillip D. Purdyb,a,d

a Department of Radiology, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
b Division of Neuroradiology, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
c Philips Medical Systems, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
d Mobility Foundation Center, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX



View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Axial FSE T2-weighted images of the canine spinal cord obtained at the T4 level (acquisition, 1; TR/TE/flip angle, 1150/110/90°; TSE factor, 35; bandwidth, 375.6 Hz; matrix, 256 x 256 with 90% Fourier in phase [90% image]; section thickness, 3 mm; spatial resolution, 0.62 mm x 0.62 mm and FOV, 16 cm with a reduced field of view [RFOV] of 80% obtained with the endospinal coil [left] and a surface coil [right]). Note the presence of higher cord signal intensity in the endospinal coil images. Arrow denotes artifact from the endospinal coil.



View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Axial FSE T2-weighted images of a cadaver spine obtained at the T4 level (acquisitions, 1; TR/TE/flip angle, 4055.8/100/90°; TSE factor, 14; bandwidth, 144.7 Hz; matrix, 256 x 256 with 70% image; section thickness, 5 mm; spatial resolution, 0.39 mm x 0.39 mm; and FOV, 10 cm with RFOV of 80%) obtained with endospinal coil [left] and surface coil [right]). Arrow denotes artifact from the endospinal coil. Although the image obtained with endospinal coil has smaller usable FOV, there is greater calculated SNR of the spinal cord.



View larger version (106K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Sagittal SSFP imaging of the cadaver spine (acquisitions, 3; TR/TE/flip angle, 3.7/1.85/55°; bandwidth, 997.8 Hz; matrix, 192 x 256 with 50% image; projection slab, 15 mm; spatial resolution, 0.98 mm x 0.98 mm; and FOV, 25 cm with RFOV of 75% performed with endospinal coil [left] and surface coil [right]). Arrow denotes the endospinal coil positioned within the spinal canal. Note the greater presence of signal intensity available within the spinal canal in the endospinal coil images. Increased CSF signal intensity in endospinal coil image improves cord delineation.



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Axial SSFP images of the cadaver spine obtained at the T4 level (acquisitions, 3; TR/TE/flip angle, 3.7/1.85/55°; bandwidth, 997.8 Hz; matrix, 192 x 256 with 50% image; projection slab, 15 mm; spatial resolution, 0.98 mm x 0.98 mm; and FOV, 25 cm with RFOV of 75%). Note the significantly greater amount of canal and cord signal intensity present with the endospinal coil (left) versus the surface coil (right).



View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 5. Axial high-resolution FSE T2-weighted image of the canine cord obtained at the T4 level (acquisitions, 1; TR/TE/flip angle, 4000/100/90°; TSE factor, 12; bandwidth, 128.9 Hz; matrix, 256 x 256 with 70% image; section thickness, 3 mm; spatial resolution, 0.23 mm x 0.23 mm; and FOV, 6 cm with RFOV of 70%) obtained with endospinal coil. Arrow denotes artifact from endospinal coil in dorsal subarachnoid space.



View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 6. Sagittal (right) and parasagittal (left) FSE T2-weighted images of the canine spine (acquisitions, 1; TR/TE/flip angle, 3000/100/90°; TSE factor, 12; bandwidth, 121 Hz; matrix, 256 x 256 with 80% image; section thickness, 3 mm; spatial resolution, 0.39 mm x 0.31 mm; and FOV, 8 cm with RFOV of 70%) obtained with endospinal coil. Asterisks denote disk spaces and arrows denote neural foramina.



View larger version (99K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 7. The endospinal coil used in this experiment is a 0.032-inch loopless antenna/guidewire consisting of an 8-cm-long dipole antenna connected to a 92-cm first coaxial cable. Tuning and matching circuits are external. Second coaxial cable connects the apparatus to MR receiver by means of an adapter.