AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guillevin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiras, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guillevin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiras, J.

N-Butyl 2-Cyanoacrylate Embolization of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae: CT Evaluation, Technical Features, and Outcome Prognosis in 26 Cases

Remy Guillevina, J. N. Valleea, E. Cormiera, D. Loa, D. Dormonta and J. Chirasa

a From the Department of Neuroradiology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France




View larger version (259K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. A, Sagittal T2-weighted MR image cord swelling and central increased signal intensity into the conus, as well as enlarged pial vessels (arrow). B, Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows enhancing enlarged pial vessels (arrows). C, Anterioposterior view of spinal angiogram (injection of intercostal artery) shows filling of an SDAVF with pial drainage (arrowheads); arising from right T9 pedicle (arrow indicates catheter tip). D, Final angiogram control shows embolization cast (arrows) until the initial part of the venous drainage (arrowheads) and no more evidence of the SDAVF or the pial drainage. E, Axial CT control shows clearly embolization cast within the dura mater and into the proximal venous drainage. F, Posttreatment (15 months) sagittal T2-weighted MR image with no more evidence of cord swelling (arrowhead); central increased signal intensity has dramatically decreased, but still remains visible (long arrow). G, Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image shows no more enhancement of pial vessels previously observed on Figure 1B.



View larger version (158K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. A, Sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows cord swelling and central increased signal intensity into the conus, as well as enlarged pial vessels. B, Anterioposterior view of spinal angiogram (injection of intercostal artery) shows filling of an SDAVF with pial drainage (arrowheads), arising from left T6 pedicle (arrow indicates catheter tip). C, Angiogram control shows embolization cast (arrowheads) and no more evidence of the SDAVF nor the pial drainage. D, Axial CT control shows embolization cast in foraminal location, but not within the dura mater. E, Posttreatment (8 months) sagittal T2-weighted MR image (patient with clinical worsening after an initial period of improvement). Cord swelling and central increased signal intensity into the conus are remaining, as well as enlarged pial vessels. F, Anterioposterior view of control spinal angiogram shows recurrence of SDAVF arising from right T6 pedicle via retrocorporeal anastomosis (arrowheads).