Rapid and Fully Automated Visualization of Subdural Electrodes in the Presurgical Evaluation of Epilepsy Patients
Dimitri Kovaleva,
Joachim Spreerb,
Jürgen Honeggerc,
Josef Zentnerc,
Andreas Schulze-Bonhagea and
Hans-Jürgen Huppertza
a Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
b Section of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
c Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 1. The image data processing is fully automated and consists of the following steps: 1) coregistration of the postimplantation image to the preimplantation image; 2A) normalization of the preimplantation image; 2B) normalization of the postimplantation image based on the transformation parameters derived from the normalization of the preimplantation image; 3A) brain extraction in the preimplantation image; and 3B) brain extraction in the coregistered postimplantation image by using the skull-stripped preimplantation image as a mask.
| |

View larger version (94K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 2. The resulting skull-stripped postimplantation image is visualized within MRIcro. A simultaneous examination of the skull-stripped preimplantation and postimplantation 3D MR images in two yoked MRIcro application windows gives an excellent overview of the exact location of each electrode contact. The viewer is able to grasp the electrodes spatial relation to the sulcal pattern of the brain and to anatomic landmarks (e.g., the central sulcus as pointed out here by the crosshairs).
| |

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 3. Subdural strip and double strip electrodes and their relationship to the Sylvian fissure (left) and to the precentral gyrus (right).
| |

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 4. Lesions beneath the grid or the brain surface (here polymicrogyria) can be highlighted by loading as color-coded overlays and subsequent semitransparent volume rendering. The individual position of each electrode contact with respect to the presumed epileptogenic lesion can be exactly depicted by using yoked coregistered planar MR images alongside the 3D MR imaging data.
| |

View larger version (99K):
[in a new window]
|
FIG 5. To allow for optimal visualization of electrodes on the posterior basal surface of the brain, the brain extraction (see Fig 1, step 3B) is optionally combined with masking the cerebellum in the skull-stripped postimplantation image.
| |