AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schueler, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cloft, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schueler, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cloft, H. J.

3D Cerebral Angiography: Radiation Dose Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography

Beth A. Schuelera, David F. Kallmesa and Harry J. Clofta

a From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Rochester, MN



View larger version (76K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Skin dose distribution for (A) 3D RA and (B) biplanar DSA. The exposed film is overlaid on a graphic representation of skin surface unfolded from the anterior midline.



View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Volume-rendered 3D RA image after coil embolization of a complex left ophthalmic aneurysm. On biplanar angiography, the coil mass overlapped the parent vessel in both views. The lumen was easily viewed on the reconstructed 3D RA image. During embolization, we used serial 3D RA runs to assess whether each additional coil compromised the lumen of the parent artery.