AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutin, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Gutin, P. H.

The Effect of Prior Surgery on Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent Functional MR Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Brain Tumors

Michael J.J. Kima, Andrei I. Holodnya, Bob L. Houa, Kyung K. Pecka, Chaya S. Moskowitzb, Dmitry L. Bogomolnya and Philip H. Gutinc

a Department of Radiology, Functional MRI Laboratory, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
c Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Average volume of activation measurements in prior-surgery (PS) and no-prior-surgery (NPS) groups. There is a marked decrease in the tumor side activation volumes of patients with prior surgery.



View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. In patient 40, there is robust activation in the right motor cortex but little detectable activity in the left motor cortex. In the T2-weighted image (A), the area containing the signal intensity void (arrow) corresponds to the physical location of a titanium plate installed during a prior operation. The susceptibility artifact is not visible in the T1-weighted image (B).



View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. In patient 33, the location of the susceptibility artifact is further away from the motor cortex than in patient 40 (Fig 2). Correspondingly, the signal intensity dropout is less severe.