AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E.S.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, E.S.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A.J.

Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography

E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons and A.J. Fox

Department of Neuroradiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada
Department of Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada



View larger version (77K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. CTA showing right severe carotid bulb stenosis with deep plaque ulceration. A, Axial source image. B, Sagittal reformat. C, 3D rendered image (large arrow, stenotic ICA; dashed arrow, bulb plaque ulcer; small arrow, proximal ECA).



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Carotid stenosis measurements were obtained from axial source data at the narrowest portion of the carotid bulb. A, Source image. B, Magnified right carotid portion. C, Submillimeter measuring tool determining 3.2 mm (0.32 cm).



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Oblique artery measure. A, Axial source image with arrow toward ICA. B, Sagittal reformat showing oblique ICA axis of a slightly tortuous ICA. C, Axial measurement, perpendicular to oblique axis. This demonstrates a need for viewing reformats in addition to axial source images.




View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Correlation scatter plots. Interobserver agreement between reader measurements. A, Maximum stenosis (mm). B, Distal ICA (mm). C, Derived NASCET-style percent stenosis. (Correlations: 2-tailed significance = 0.01. n values reflect exclusion of pairwise missing data; excludes "near-occlusion" cases).



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Linear regression. Mean percent stenosis to mean millimeter maximum carotid bulb stenosis. (Pearson correlation = –0.95; n = 136; 2-tailed significance = 0.01; R2 linear = 0.895; SE of estimate = 7.63; B value = –21.539).



View larger version (94K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Axial source images of left severe ICA stenosis; small residual lumen with vessel wall plaque and thick calcification on the sides. A, Source axial image with "standard" W : L settings for CTA evaluation (W 750 : L 200). B, Magnified left ICA (W 750 : L 200). C, Magnified with wide window for appropriate visualization and measurement of residual carotid lumen (W 900 : L 275). A wider W : L setting allows conspicuity between the different attenuations of contrast in lumen and calcification along the sides.