AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Schaaf, I.
Right arrow Articles by van Osch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Schaaf, I.
Right arrow Articles by van Osch, T.

Influence of Partial Volume on Venous Output and Arterial Input Function

I. van der Schaafa, E.-J. Vonkena, A. Waaijera, B. Velthuisa, M. Quistb and T. van Oscha,c

a Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrechtv, Best, the Netherlands
b Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands
c Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands



View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. A circular region of interest with a standard size of 2.5 cm in diameter was drawn in the peripheral anterior flow territory at the level of the basal ganglia on a standard location containing both white and gray matter. The location of the measurement of the AIF (artery) and the VOF (vein) are also indicated.



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Mean AUC for the VOF (A), AIF (B) and mean widths of the AIF (C) for 12-mm ({circ}), 6-mm ({blacksquare}), and 3-mm (•) section thickness in 10 patients. In all patients, a smaller section thickness results in an equal or larger AUC of the VOF (A) and AIF (B). The width of the AIF decreases slightly (C) with a smaller section thickness in most patients.



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Raw attenuation curves of the optimal VOF for 12-mm ({circ}), 6-mm ({blacksquare}), and 3-mm (•) section thickness (same patient as in Fig 1).