Measuring Longitudinal White Matter Changes: Comparison of a Visual Rating Scale with a Volumetric Measurement
D.M.J. van den Heuvela,
V.H. ten Damb,
A.J.M. de Craenb,
F. Admiraal-Behloulc,
A.C.G.M. van Esa,
W.M. Palma,
A. Spilta,
E.L.E.M. Bollend,
G.J. Blauwb,
L. Launere,
R.G.J. Westendorpb,
M.A. van Buchema on behalf of the PROSPER Study Group
a Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
b Departments of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
c Division of Image Processing, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
d Division of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
e Division of Epidemiology, Demography Biostatistics, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. Computerized semiautomatic detection system for quantification of volumes of deep and periventricular WMH. Red indicates deep WMH and blue indicates periventricular WMH.
| |

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig 2. 3D representation of manually segmented deep WMH (red) and periventricular WMH (blue). The lateral ventricles are presented in green. The parenchyma is displayed in yellow.
| |

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig 3. Graph shows longitudinal evaluation of WMH change in 100 elderly subjects by using (A) a visual rating scale (ie, Scheltens scale) and (B) a volumetric method. Black indicates the number of subjects showing WMH regression at the end of follow-up; gray indicates the number of subjects showing no change in WMH or WMH progression at the end of follow-up.
| |