AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goebell, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zeumer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goebell, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zeumer, H.

Disarrangement of Fiber Tracts and Decline of Neuronal Density Correlate in Glioma Patients—A Combined Diffusion Tensor Imaging and 1H-MR Spectroscopy Study

E. Goebella, J. Fiehlera, X.-Q. Dinga, S. Paustenbacha, S. Nietza, O. Heeseb, T. Kucinskia, C. Hagelc, M. Westphalb and H. Zeumera

a Department of Neuroradiology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
b Department of Neurosurgery, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
c Department of Neuropathology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (107K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. A, Regions of interest were placed in the spectroscopic matrix on T2-weighted images (2720/126; 256 x 256 matrix; field of view, 230 x 230 mm; section thickness, 6 mm) in the tumor center (TC), the border of the tumor (TB), the normal-appearing white matter adjacent to the tumor (TNWM), and in the white matter of the contralateral hemisphere (NWMC).

B, After reslicing and coregristration with the T2-weighted images, the ROIs were transferred to the FA maps (4900/90 ms; 256 x 256 matrix; field of view, 230 x 230 mm; section thickness, 3 mm; b values, 0, 1500 seconds/mm2; EPI factor, 36).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Median FA values and NAA ratios in the different volumes of interest in the patients.


Figure 3
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Box plot of the N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratios in patients and the control group.


Figure 4
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Box plot of the N-acetylaspartate/choline ratios in patients and the control group.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Box plot of the FA values in patients and the control group.


Figure 6
View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Correlation of median FA values and NAA ratios in the different volumes of interest.


Figure 7
View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. Distribution of individual FA values of the patients in relation to the corresponding NAA ratios.