AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strub, W.M.
Right arrow Articles by Bulas, R.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strub, W.M.
Right arrow Articles by Bulas, R.V.

Sacroplasty by CT and Fluoroscopic Guidance: Is the Procedure Right for Your Patient?

W.M. Struba, M. Hoffmannb, R.J. Ernstb and R.V. Bulasb

a Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
b Department of Radiology, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio


Figure 1
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. CT images from needle placement in 2 different patients with sacral insufficiency fractures illustrating the possible orientation for the bone biopsy needle(s) in the sacrum.

A, Axial image showing vertical orientation of the bone biopsy needles in a patient with bilateral fractures.

B. Axial image showing an oblique orientation, paralleling the sacroiliac joint of the bone biopsy needle, in a patient with a unilateral fracture.


Figure 2
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Fluoroscopic spot films taken during the PMMA injection in a 65-year-old woman with bilateral sacral insufficiency fractures.

A, Frontal projection allows for monitoring of extravasation into the sacral foramina.

B, Lateral projection allows for monitoring for any cement extravasation into the soft tissues.