AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silvennoinen, H.M.
Right arrow Articles by Valanne, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silvennoinen, H.M.
Right arrow Articles by Valanne, L.

CT Angiographic Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Manual Assessment, Semiautomatic Vessel Analysis, and Digital Subtraction Angiography

H.M. Silvennoinena, S. Ikonena, L. Soinnea, M. Railoa and L. Valannea

a From the Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of Radiology, Helsinki, Finland


Figure 1
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Measurement of the internal carotid artery stenosis in CTA axial images according to NASCET.

A, Maximal stenosis in left ICA.

B, Normalized vessel diameter. The reference point was chosen so that diameters are the same over a distance.


Figure 2
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. A, Stenosis measurement levels marked to CTA MIP images according to NASCET. Dental filling artifacts are shown.

B, Vessel analysis method in determination of the grade of stenosis. Dental filling artifacts are shown.

C, DSA image.


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. Scatterplot of degrees of stenosis in CTA (A) versus DSA (B) with regression line and 95% confidence intervals.


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. Histogram of average degrees within different categories of stenosis by method of assessment.


Figure 5
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 5. Poststenotic collapse. A, Maximal stenosis in left ICA (big arrow). Calcification behind the open lumen. The right ICA is normal (small arrow).

B, The distal left ICA (big arrow) remains collapsed. Normal right ICA (small arrow).

C, MIP image of the left ICA.

D, DSA image of the left ICA.


Figure 6
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 6. Underestimation of stenosis in DSA. A, An axial MIP image from the left ICA stenosis graded severe by CTA (arrow). According to the vessel analysis method (B, C) the stenosis is 77%. In DSA, the maximum stenosis is 50% (D). In surgery, the stenosis turned out to be severe.