Published ahead of print on September 24, 2007
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0688
Role of Perfusion CT in Glioma Grading and Comparison with Conventional MR Imaging Features
S.K. Ellikaa,
R. Jaina,
S.C. Patela,
L. Scarpaceb,
L.R. Schultzc,
J.P. Rockb and
T. Mikkelsenb
a Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich
b Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich
c Departments of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. A, Postcontrast T1-weighted axial image in a 46-year-old man with WHO grade IV glioma showing a markedly enhancing bifrontal necrotic tumor with involvement of the genu of the corpus callosum and surrounding perilesional white matter edema. B, PCT CBV map showing elevated blood volume (nCBV = 4.3). C, CBF map showing elevated blood flow (nCBF = 6.27). D, MTT map showing decreased MTT (nMTT = 0.63) within the tumor.
| |

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 2. WHO grade III glioma in a 39-year-old woman. A, Postcontrast T1-weighted axial image showing a large heterogeneously enhancing left temporal mass lesion with significant mass effect. B, Corresponding CBV map showing elevated blood volume (nCBV = 2.61). C, CBF map showing increased blood flow (nCBF = 1.65). D, MTT map showing decreased MTT (nMTT = 1.68) within the tumor. Also note the mismatch between areas of increased blood volume/blood flow on the CBV/CBF maps and the areas of gadolinium enhancement.
| |

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 3. A 34-year-old man with WHO grade II glioma. A, Postcontrast T1-weighted axial image showing a nonenhancing mass in the right frontal lobe. B, CBV map showing low blood volume (nCBV = 0.94). C, CBF map showing decreased blood flow (nCBF = 1.26). D, MTT map showing increased transit time (nMTT = 1.07) within the tumor.
| |

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 4. Scatter plot for nCBV versus grade of tumor showing the threshold to differentiate low- from high-grade tumors.
| |

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 5. Scatter plot for nCBF versus grade of tumor showing the threshold to differentiate low- from high-grade tumors.
| |

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 6. Scatter plot for nMTT versus grade of tumor showing the threshold to differentiate low- from high-grade tumors.
| |