AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Online Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nave, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mascalchi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nave, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mascalchi, M.

Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Leukoaraiosis: Correlation with Motor and Cognitive Impairment

R. Della Navea, S. Forestia, A. Pratesia, A. Ginestronia, M. Inzitarib, E. Salvadorib, M. Giannellid, S. Diciottic, D. Inzitarib and M. Mascalchia

a From the Radiodiagnostic Section, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
b Clinica Neurologica III, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
c Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
d Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. AD, Whole-brain MD (A) and FA (B) histograms in a patient with low (n = 2) visual score of LA (continuous line), as shown by corresponding FLAIR images (C), and in a patient with high (n = 6) visual score of LA (dashed line), as shown by corresponding FLAIR images (D).

A and B, The patient with the higher visual score shows higher 50th percentile (85.9 vs. 84.7) and lower kurtosis and skewness of the MD histogram (A) and lower 50th percentile (0.165 vs. 0.226) and higher kurtosis and skewness of the FA histogram (B) compared to the patient with lower visual score.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. A–C, SPM2 "glass brain" representation showing large clusters in the corpus callosum and pericallosal white matter of significant (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparison by false discovery rate method) correlation between increasing MD value and scores of motor deficit (usual gait velocity in A; SPPB in B) in patients with LA. Superimposition of the same cluster demonstrated in B onto T1 template (C).


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. A and B, SPM2 "glass brain" representation showing small clusters in the corpus callosum of significant (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparison by false discovery rate method) correlation using small volume correction between decreasing FA value and scores of motor deficit (usual gait velocity in A; SPPB in B) in patients with LA.