Published ahead of print on November 1, 2007
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0813
Comparison of Three Different Methods for Measurement of Cervical Cord Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis
R. Zivadinova,b,
A.C. Banasa,
V. Yellab,
N. Abdelrahmanb,
B. Weinstock-Guttmana and
M.G. Dwyerb
a Jacobs Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
b Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. Cervical cord identification and quantification. Left, Original cervical 3D SPGR-T1WI. Center, Edge-detection image. Right, Cord edges identified by operator.
| |

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 2. Cervical canal identification and quantification. Left, Original cervical T2WI. Center, Edge-detection image. Right, Spinal canal edge identified by operator.
| |

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 3. Correlation of cervical cord absolute volume and brain parenchyma fraction with disability, as measured by EDSS.
| |