AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on January 25, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0891

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, M.T.
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, M.T.
Right arrow Articles by Anzai, Y.

Balancing Radiation Dose and Image Quality: Clinical Applications of Neck Volume CT

M.T. Russella, J.R. Finka, F. Rebelesa, K. Kanala, M. Ramosa and Y. Anzaia

a From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash


Figure 1
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Pooled scores from 2 blinded readers regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts. There is minimal decrease in image quality, with slight increase in noise in ATCM techniques compared with the fixed mA technique. The magnitude of the difference is small (0.22) on a 5-point scale and does not seem to be clinically significant.


Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. CT images through the posterior fossa with use of the fixed-tube current technique (A), ATCM with noise index of 11.4 (B), and ATCM with noise index of 20.2 (C). There is no perceivable difference in overall image quality among the 3 different techniques. All images are of diagnostic quality.


Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. CT images through thoracic inlet with use of fixed-tube current technique (A), ATCM with noise index of 11.4 (B), and ATCM with noise index of 20.2 (C). There is no perceivable difference in image quality and noise level. No difference in the degree of streak artifact is noted.


Figure 4
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. CT images through the neck with use of the fixed-tube current technique (A), ATCM with noise index of 11.4 (B), and ATCM with noise index of 20.2 (C). There is no perceivable difference in overall image quality. All images are of diagnostic quality.