AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Udayasankar, U.K.
Right arrow Articles by Palasis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Udayasankar, U.K.
Right arrow Articles by Palasis, S.

Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality

U.K. Udayasankara, K. Braithwaiteb, M. Arvanitib, D. Tudorascua, W.C. Smalla, S. Littleb and S. Palasisb

a Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga
b Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, Ga


Figure 1
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Diagnostic acceptability of low-dose CT studies. Standard-dose (A) and low-dose (B) head CT studies were obtained in a 16-year-old male adolescent at an interval of 8 months and were rated as good (grade 4) by both readers.


Figure 2
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. A,B, Attenuation characteristics of standard-dose and low-dose head CT studies in a 7-year-old girl with a shunt for hydrocephalus. (A) Transverse standard-dose supraventricular CT image with sample ROIs (white circles) showed GM and WM attenuations of 31.6 HU and 25.6 HU, respectively, with noise (SD, HU within ROI) levels of 1.6 HU and 1.8 HU. Low-dose image (B) showed no significant change in attenuation (30.6 HU and 26.8 HU) despite increased noise levels (4.3 HU and 2.8 HU). CNR of standard-dose CT (1.88) was significantly higher (P < .01) than that of low-dose CT (0.47). However, both readers ranked standard-dose (grade 4) and low-dose (grade 3) studies as diagnostically acceptable.