Published ahead of print on April 3, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0993
Inclusion or Exclusion of Intratumoral Vessels in Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Characterization in Low-Grade Gliomas: Does It Make a Difference?
G. Brasil Caseirasa,b,
J.S. Thorntona,
T. Yousrya,b,
C. Bentonb,
J. Reesb,
A.D. Waldmanc and
H.R. Jägera,b
a Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
b Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
c Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1. T2*-weighted image during maximum arterial signal intensity drop (A) and rCBV map (B) in low-grade OD, demonstrating the position of ROIs used to calculate rCBVmax. Method 1 (open arrowhead, posterior ROI in the left cerebral hemisphere, overlying an intratumoral vessel) and method 2 (closed arrowhead, anterior ROI in the left cerebral hemisphere, lying outside intratumoral vessels). The mean CBV from contralateral normal-appearing white matter (ROI in the right cerebral hemisphere) was used to normalize the data for each method. White circles have been superimposed on the original color-coded ROIs generated by FuncTool.
| |