AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on August 13, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1201

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelles, M.
Right arrow Articles by Urbach, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelles, M.
Right arrow Articles by Urbach, H.

Combined 3T Diffusion Tensor Tractography and 1H-MR Spectroscopy in Motor Neuron Disease

M. Nellesa, W. Blocka, F. Träbera, U. Wüllnerb, H.H. Schilda and H. Urbacha

a Department of Radiology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany
b Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Center, Bonn, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. A, Illustration of spectroscopic VOI in the central region in axial (left hemisphere) and coronal (right hemisphere) T2-weighted planscan images (left, upper and lower row). Sample spectra (TR/TE, 2000/140 ms; H2O-suppressed) of a healthy control (right, upper row) and patient IV/7 (Table 1) (right, lower row). B, 3D DTT (left) with intersection lines (yellow) shown at the level of FA/MD measurements (precentral gyrus, corona radiata, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, pons, and pyramid). Fibers are projected onto axial FA (right/upper row, precentral gyrus) and MD maps (right/lower row, internal capsule) to allow a guided region-of-interest placement along the corticospinal tract. FA and MD statistics were additionally averaged on the CSTs as a whole to account for a region-independent analysis.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. A, NAA/Cho and NAA/PCr metabolite ratios for patient subgroups and controls. Both parameters are lowest in group IV (EE probable/definite [prob./def.]). B, FA boxplots of the central region for groups I–IV. Mean FA values of groups III (EE clinically possible [clin. poss.]) and IV (prob./def.) were markedly lower in the upper 3 regions of measurements (Table 3).