AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on July 3, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1191

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Habas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cabanis, E.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Habas, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cabanis, E.A.

Dissociation of the Neural Networks Recruited during a Haptic Object-Recognition Task: Complementary Results with a Tensorial Independent Component Analysis

C. Habasa and E.A. Cabanisa

a From the Service de NeuroImagerie, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France


Figure 1
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. A–B, For the motor task, multisubject (n = 14) spatial maps (A1–B1, axial sections) and time courses (A2–B2) of the independent components computed during the nondiscrimination task. A2–B2, Horizontal red and blue bars represent the first rest and activity phases, each lasting 15 seconds. A2–B2, Axial sections. Z-score is represented by a color gradient (vertical colored bar). Boxplots (on the extreme right side of the figures) display the relative response amplitude across the multisubject domain for the corresponding independent component sorted in decreasing order of the median response (median and upper and lower quartile are shown). CER indicates cerebellum; CING, cingulate cortex; GR, geniculate region; INS, insula; M1/S1, sensorimotor cortex; OCC, occipital cortex; PAR, parietal cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PMC, premotor cortex; SII, secondary sensory area; SMA, supplementary motor area; ST, striatum; TEMP, temporal cortex; THAL, thalamus; TOC, temporo-occipital cortex; a, anterior; p, posterior.


Figure 2
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Multisubject (n = 14) time-courses (A1–F1) and spatial maps (A2–F2, A3) of the independent components (A–F) computed during the tactile discrimination task. A1–F1, Horizontal red and blue bars represent the first rest and activity phases, each lasting 15 seconds. A2–F2, Axial sections. A3, Coronal section passing through the cerebellum. Z-score is represented by a color gradient (vertical colored bar). Boxplots (on the extreme right side of the figures) display the relative response amplitude across the multisubject domain for the corresponding independent component sorted in decreasing order of the median response (median and upper and lower quartile are shown). CER indicates cerebellum; CING, cingulate cortex; GR, geniculate region; INS, insula; M1/S1, sensorimotor cortex; OCC, occipital cortex; PAR, parietal cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PMC, premotor cortex; SII, secondary sensory area; SMA, supplementary motor area; ST, striatum; TEMP, temporal cortex; THAL, thalamus; TOC, temporo-occipital cortex; a, anterior; p, posterior.