AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on October 14, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1327

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.S.P.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, L.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, J.S.P.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, L.-L.

Comparison of Eye Lens Dose on Neuroimaging Protocols between 16- and 64-Section Multidetector CT: Achieving the Lowest Possible Dose

J.S.P. Tana, K.-L. Tana, J.C.L. Leec, C.-M. Wana, J.-L. Leongb and L.-L. Chana

a Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
b Department of Otolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
c Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore


Figure 1
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Graphic comparison of mean eye lens dose between 16-section and 64-section MDCT for the neuroimaging CT protocols studied.


Figure 2
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. A, Photograph of a volunteer; B, sagittal scout image with section lines of a patient in the chin tuck position during a CT brain scanning on a 64-section MDCT to remove the eyes from the radiation beam. C, Sagittal scout image with section lines for a CT brain scanning in a tilted axial mode on the 16-section MDCT for comparison.