|
FIG 1. Comparison of the three visually evaluated echogenicity groups of plaques (types 1, 2, and 3) in terms of GSM.FIG 2. Interoperator reproducibility of the BE evaluation.FIG 3. Intraoperator reproducibility of the BE evaluationFIG 4. An intermediate hypoechoic (GSM, 17) and smooth (BE, 0.32) plaque.FIG 5. An intermediate hyperechoic (GSM, 48) and intermediately irregularly surfaced (BE, 1.5) plaque.FIG 6. Comparison of the three visually evaluated echo-surface groups of the plaques (types 1, 2, and 3) in terms of BE
|