AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klisch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klisch, J.

ARTICLE

In Re: Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Assessment with Dynamic MR Digital Subtraction Angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1892–1899

Joachim Klischa

a University Freiburg Freiburg, Germany


    Introduction
 TOP
 Introduction
 References
 
I read with interest the article by Griffiths et al published in the AJNR (1), in which the authors describe the early experience with an experimental dynamic MR angiographic method using a contrast agent and a digital mask for cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) assessment. We enjoy Griffiths et al's article because they show again that MR digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a noninvasive, dynamic angiographic tool. It should be noted that there are missing references in the reference list of the article, and we would like to bring to your attention that MR DSA already could be performed with two frames per second, as described in our February 2000 article in Neuroradiology (2), as well as described by Strecker et al (3, 4). MR-DSA today can be performed with four frames per second when the projection sequence is combined with view-sharing techniques (R. Strecker, personal communication). Post-processing of images in MR-DSA according to the algorithm proposed for functional MR imaging offers several advantages with significant improvement of signal-to-noise ratio of up to a factor of three, background suppression without subtraction, and clear artery-vein separation, even in brain vessels. By the use of these modifications, MR-DSA becomes a promising clinical tool, eg, in the assessment of dural AVMs and brain AVMs. However, all MR-DSA techniques described cannot replace catheter angiography, with its high anatomic and temporal resolution, for planning endovascular therapy.


    References
 TOP
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-1899[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical applications in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000;42:104-107[Medline]

  3. Strecker R, Scheffler K, Klisch J, Lehnhardt S, Winterer S, Laubenberger J, et al. Fast functional MRA using time-resolved projection MR-angiography with correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:303-309[Medline]

  4. Strecker R, Lehnhardt S, Klisch J, Hennig J. Functional MRA combining 2D MR DSA and correlation analysis. Proc Intl Magn Reson Med 1999;7:484





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klisch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klisch, J.