Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Friedman, D. P.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:1601, September 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

Letter

Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography— Does Gender Matter?

David P. Friedman^a

^a Department of Radiology
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pa

I read with interest the report by Bartlett et al¹ describing a linear relationship between millimeter carotid stenosis, as measured on CT angiography, and derived percent stenosis. According to the "Materials and Methods" section, the authors did not evaluate their patient population on the basis of sex. Tartaglino et al,² however, reported that men and women differ in the average size of their internal carotid arteries (ICAs) on CT angiography by a minimum of 10% (larger in men). It is interesting to note that average brain weight is also approximately 10% greater in men than women. Bartlett et al reported an average distal ICA diameter of 4.4 mm. If their study population included equal numbers of men and women, it is plausible that the average distal ICA diameter would have been 4.6 mm in men and 4.2 mm in women. A 1.3-mm residual lumen in a female patient with a distal ICA diameter of 4.2 cm yields a 69% stenosis. Moreover, some women would likely have even smaller distal ICA diameters, resulting in a degree of stenosis <69%. Tartaglino et al² found that the 70% stenosis threshold by North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria required a smaller residual diameter for women than for men.

In summary, there is a potential effect of sex on the authors’ measurement of 1.3 mm as a threshold value for assigning stenosis 70% by NASCET criteria. Although the potential effect is subtle, assigning separate threshold measurements for men and women (even if these differed by only 1 mm) might have further strengthened the authors’ conclusions.

	References

TOP References

 

1. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Tartaglino LM, Hollander MD. Needleman L. CT angiography of carotid stenosis: should the NASCET criteria be different for men and women? Radiology 1997;205(P):231–32

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, D. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Friedman, D. P.