Click on image to view larger version.
Fig 4. Graph demonstrates rates of global GM CBF (in milliliters per 100 grams per minute), expressed as means ± SDs for 3 groups (infarction negative, infarction positive, and anoxic injury). Rates of global CBF in the anoxic injury group are 109% and 154% higher than rates of CBF in the infarction-negative and infarction-positive control groups, respectively. Data show a statistically significant difference between the anoxic injury and infarction-negative (*) groups and infarction-positive (
) groups. There was no statistically significant difference in global rates of CBF between the infarction-positive and infarction-negative groups.
