AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on August 7, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1243

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Online Tables
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1243v1
29/10/1937    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B.M.
Right arrow Articles by Suh, B.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B.M.
Right arrow Articles by Suh, B.C.

INTERVENTIONAL

Management and Clinical Outcome of Acute Basilar Artery Dissection

B.M. Kima, S.H. Suhd, S.I. Parke, Y.S. Shinf, E.C. Chunga, M.H. Leea, E.J. Kimg, J.S. Kohh, H.-s. Kangi, H.G. Rohj, Y.S. Wonb, P.-W. Chungc, Y.-B. Kimc and B.C. Suhc

a Department of Radiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea
b Department of Neurosurgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea
c Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea
d Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
e Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
f Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
g Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
h Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
i Department of Neurosurgery, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
j Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Please address correspondence to Yong Sam Shin, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University College of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea, 442-721; e-mail: nsshin{at}ajou.ac.kr

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There have been inconsistencies on the prognosis and controversies as to the proper management of acute basilar artery dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate acute basilar artery dissection and its outcome after management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients (mean age, 53 years; range, 24–78 years) with acute basilar artery dissection were identified between January 2001 and October 2007. Clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS: The patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 10), brain stem ischemia (n = 10), or stem compression sign (n = 1). Ruptured basilar artery dissections were treated by stent placement with coiling (n = 4), single stent placement (n = 3), or conservatively (n = 3). Of the patients treated with endovascular technique, 6 had favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS], 0–2) and the remaining patient, who was treated by single stent placement, died from rebleeding. All 3 conservatively managed patients experienced rebleeding, of whom 2 died and the other was moderately disabled. Unruptured basilar artery dissections were treated conservatively (n = 7) or by stent placement (n = 4). Of the patients with unruptured basilar artery dissection, 9 had favorable outcome and the remaining 2 patients, both of whom were conservatively managed, had poor outcome because of infarct progression. The group with the ruptured basilar artery dissection revealed a higher mortality rate than the group with the unruptured dissection (30% vs 0%). The group treated with endovascular means revealed more favorable outcome than the group that was treated with conservative measures (90.9% vs 50%).

CONCLUSION: The ruptured basilar artery dissections were at high risk for rebleeding, resulting in a grave outcome. Stent placement with or without coiling may be considered to prevent rebleeding in ruptured basilar dissections and judiciously considered in unruptured dissections with signs of progressive brain stem ischemia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.-C. Jin, D.H. Kwon, C.-G. Choi, J.S. Ahn, and B.-D. Kwun
Endovascular Strategies for Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2009; 30(8): 1518 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.I. Park, B.M. Kim, D.I. Kim, Y.S. Shin, S.H. Suh, E.C. Chung, S.Y. Kim, S.H. Kim, and Y.S. Won
Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up of Stent-Only Therapy for Acute Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2009; 30(7): 1351 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]