Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on June 4, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1154

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1154v1 29/8/1450    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Figley, C.R. Articles by Stroman, P.W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Figley, C.R. Articles by Stroman, P.W.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:1450-1454, September 2008
© 2008 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Attenuation of Lower-Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Spinal Cord Motion: Implications for Imaging Human Spinal Cord Structure and Function

C.R. Figley^a, D. Yau^a,b and P.W. Stroman^a,c,d

^a Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
^b Faculty of Health Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
^c Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
^d Department of Physics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Please address correspondence to Patrick W. Stroman, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, c/o Centre for Neuroscience Studies, 228 Botterell Hall, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6; e-mail: stromanp{at}post.queensu.ca

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent literature indicates that cervical and upper-thoracic spinal cord motion adversely affect both structural and functional MR imaging (fMRI; particularly diffusion tensor imaging [DTI] and spinal fMRI), ultimately reducing the reliability of these methods for both research and clinical applications. In the present study, we investigated motion of the lower-thoracic, lumbar, and sacral cord segments to evaluate the incidence of similar motion-related confounds in these regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recently developed methods, used previously for measuring cervical and upper-thoracic spinal cord motion, were employed in the present study to examine anteroposterior (A/P) and left-right (L/R) spinal cord motion in caudal regions. Segmented cinematic imaging was applied with a gradient-echo, turbo fast low-angle shot (turbo-FLASH) pulse sequence to acquire midline images of the cord at 24 cardiac phases throughout the lower-thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal cord regions.

RESULTS: The magnitude of A/P motion was found to be largest in rostral cord regions, whereas in caudal regions (at the level of the T4/T5 vertebrae and below), peak cord motion was uniformly small (routinely 0.10 mm). L/R motion, however, was found to be minimal throughout the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions.

CONCLUSION: Motion-related errors in spinal fMRI and DTI are expected to be significantly reduced throughout caudal regions of the spinal cord, thus yielding higher sensitivity and specificity compared with rostral regions. The paucity of such errors is expected to provide a means of observing the specific impact of motion (in rostral regions) and to enable the acquisition of uncorrupted DTI and fMRI data for studies of structure and function throughout lumbar and sacral regions.