AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Published ahead of print on June 12, 2008
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1165

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1165v1
29/8/1575    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gizewski, E.R.
Right arrow Articles by Wanke, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gizewski, E.R.
Right arrow Articles by Wanke, I.

INTERVENTIONAL

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients 65 Years or Older: Clinical Outcomes

E.R. Gizewskia, S. Görickea, A. Wolfa, B. Schochb, D. Stolkeb, M. Forstinga and I. Wankea

a Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
b Clinic of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Please address correspondence to Elke R. Gizewski, MD, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr 55, D-45127 Essen, Germany; e-mail: elke.gizewski{at}uni-due.de

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A controversial discussion concerning treatment of aneurysms in elderly patients exists. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical outcome in patients older than 65 years harboring intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients aged 65 years or older (mean age, 72 years, range, 65–87 years) were selected for endovascular treatment between 1997 and 2005. A total of 85 (78.7%) patients had an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). SAH was classified according to Hunt and Hess (HH) grade: I (n = 16), II (n = 11), III (n = 33), IV (n = 19), and V (n = 6). There were 69 aneurysms that were small; 46, medium; 8, large; and 5, giant. Occlusion rate was categorized as complete (100%), subtotal (95% to 99%), and incomplete (<95%) obliteration according to the Raymond scale.

RESULTS: Endovascular treatment was technically feasible in 108 of 113 aneurysms. Complete occlusion could be achieved in 80 patients; basal remnant was seen in 26 patients and a dog ear in 2 patients. Procedural complications included thrombotic vessel occlusion (n = 9), aneurysmal rupture (n = 4), and stenosis of the parent vessel (n = 2). The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) for the patients with SAH after 6 months was good recovery (n = 43), moderate disability (n = 12), severe disability (n = 28), persistent vegetative state (n = 5), and death (n = 18). Outcome for the patients with unruptured aneurysms was good recovery in all 23 patients. On follow-up digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 69 patients, complete aneurysmal occlusion was confirmed in 81% after 6 months. Five patients with recanalization were re-treated with coiling.

CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms in this subgroup was safe and effective.