AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published September 20, 2007

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2007;28:1806.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A0639v1
28/9/1806    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M.T.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Time-Resolved Spinal MR Angiography: Initial Clinical Experience in the Evaluation of Spinal Arteriovenous Shunts

S. Ali, T.A. Cashen, T.J. Carroll, E. McComb, M. Muzaffar, A. Shaibani and M.T. Walker

From the Department of Radiology (S.A., T.A.C., T.J.C., E.M., M.M., A.S., M.T.W.), Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.A.C., T.J.C.), Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

Please address correspondence to Saad Ali, 676 N St Clair, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611; e-mail: saad-ali{at}northwestern.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal arteriovenous shunts usually require digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for evaluation. We report a unique time-resolved spinal MR angiographic (TRSMRA) technique with a temporal resolution of 3–6 seconds and spatial resolution of approximately 1 mm3 that has the potential to noninvasively detect, localize, and follow-up these cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with clinical presentation and/or MR findings suspicious for a spinal arteriovenous shunt were referred for TRSMRA. Patients subsequently underwent spinal DSA to confirm the presence or absence of a shunt or were followed clinically until an alternative diagnosis was found. TRSMRA was also used to predict the level of the shunt in the positive cases. In addition, 2 of these patients as well as a 12th patient referred to us posttreatment received a follow-up TRSMRA to assess treatment outcome.

RESULTS: Early venous shunting was identified by using TRSMRA in 6 cases. All 6 were confirmed to have an AV shunt on subsequent spinal DSA. The shunt level predicted by TRSMRA consistently correlated with DSA to within 1 vertebral level. In the 5 patients with a negative screening TRSMRA, DSA or clinical outcome confirmed the absence of an arteriovenous shunt in all of the cases. Posttreatment TRSMRA in 3 patients accurately assessed the success or failure of treatment.

CONCLUSION: Combining acceleration techniques to achieve high frame rate TRSMRA provides sufficient temporal and spatial resolution to identify, localize, and follow patients suspected of having a spinal arteriovenous shunt. Further study in a larger population is warranted to assess the accuracy of this technique.