AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published October 5, 2007

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;29:40.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A0743v1
ajnr.A0743v2
29/1/40    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mukherji, S.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Srinivasan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mukherji, S.K.

HEAD & NECK

Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pathology in the Head and Neck Using 3T Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values: Early Experience

A. Srinivasan, R. Dvorak, K. Perni, S. Rohrer and S.K. Mukherji

From the Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Please address correspondence to Ashok Srinivasan, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; e-mail: ashoks{at}med.umich.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to study differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between benign and malignant head and neck lesions at 3T field strength imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study population in this retrospective study was derived from the patient population who had undergone routine neck 3T MR imaging (for clinical indications) from December 2005 to December 2006. There were 33 patients identified: 17 with benign and 16 with malignant pathologies. In all of the subjects, conventional MR imaging sequences were performed apart from diffusion-weighted sequences. The mean ADC values in the benign and malignant groups were compared using an unpaired t test with unequal variance with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference (P = .004) between the mean ADC values (in 10–3 mm2/s) in the benign and malignant lesions (1.505 ± 0.487; 95% confidence interval, 1.305–1.706, and 1.071 ± 0.293; 95% confidence interval, 0.864–1.277, respectively). There were 2 malignant lesions with ADC values higher than 1.3 x 10–3 mm2/s and 5 benign lesions with ADC values less than 1.3 x 10–3 mm2/s. The lack of overlap of ADC values within 95% confidence limits suggests that a 3T ADC value of 1.3 x 10–3 mm2/s may be the threshold value for differentiation between benign and malignant head and neck lesions.

CONCLUSION: ADC values of benign and malignant neck pathologies are significantly different at 3T imaging, though larger studies are required to establish threshold ADC values that can applied in daily clinical practice.