AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published November 1, 2007

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;29:269.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A0823v1
29/2/269    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Fernandez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mayol Deya, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martinez-Fernandez, E.
Right arrow Articles by Mayol Deya, A.

INTERVENTIONAL

Clinical and Electroencephalographic Features of Carotid Sinus Syncope Induced by Internal Carotid Artery Angioplasty

E. Martinez-Fernandez, F. Boza García, J.R. Gonzalez-Marcos, A. Gil Peralta, A. Gonzalez Garcia and A. Mayol Deya

From the Departments of Neurology (E.M.-F., J.R.G.-M., A.G.P.), Neurophysiology (F.B.G.), and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.G.G., A.M.D.), Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain.

Please address correspondence to Eva Martinez-Fernandez, MD, Av. Reina Mercedes n 35, 6 D, 41012 Seville, Spain; e-mail: emartinezf{at}ya.com

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid sinus syncope may occur acutely during internal carotid artery angioplasty (CA). We performed this study to investigate the clinical, electroencephalographic (EEG), and hemodynamic features of carotid sinus syncope induced by CA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2003, clinical, EEG, and cardiovascular monitoring was performed in 359 consecutive patients undergoing CA.

RESULTS: Carotid sinus reaction (CSR) and syncope occurred in 62.7% and 18.6% of the procedures, respectively. CSR and syncopal spells were classified into cardioinhibitory, vasodepressor, and mixed type. Syncope occurred more frequently in patients with cardioinhibitory CSR (P < .001). The odds ratios for the risk of syncope in patients with cardioinhibitory CSR and vasodepressor/mixed CSR were 6.9 and 1.4, respectively. Sixty-one patients had cardioinhibitory syncope; 7 had the vasodepressor/mixed type. Thirteen spells were not related to cardiovascular disturbances. This last syncope subtype was significantly associated with brain hemodynamic disturbances, including a decrease in cerebral vasoreactivity (P = .04) and the absence of function of both communicating arteries (P = .03). Convulsive movements resembling supplementary sensorimotor seizures occurred in 79% of patients who experienced syncopal spells. EEG changes were more prominent in patients with cardioinhibitory syncope.

CONCLUSIONS: Syncope occurs frequently in patients undergoing CA and can be misdiagnosed as seizures. The most frequent mechanism was a cardioinhibitory response. Cerebral hemodynamic disturbances may play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of syncope with normal sinus rhythm and normotension. Moreover, direct depression of the CNS following carotid sinus distension is likely to be involved.