AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published April 16, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;29:1335.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Online Table
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1093v1
29/7/1335    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leach, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Tomsick, T.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leach, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by Tomsick, T.A.

BRAIN

Large Arachnoid Granulations Involving the Dorsal Superior Sagittal Sinus: Findings on MR Imaging and MR Venography

J.L. Leach, K. Meyer, B.V. Jones and T.A. Tomsick

From the Department of Radiology (J.L.L., K.M., B.V.J., T.A.T.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging (J.L.L., B.V.J.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; and The Neuroscience Institute (J.L.L., T.A.T.), Cincinnati, Ohio.

Please address correspondence to James L. Leach, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229; e-mail: james.leach{at}cchmc.org

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Large arachnoid granulations (AG) within the dorsal superior sagittal sinus (SSS) have been incompletely characterized and can be confused with pathology. This report reviews the characteristics of these anatomic structures to establish common imaging features that allow differentiation from pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve cases of large AG in the dorsal SSS are presented, identified by MR imaging. Signal intensity characteristics, size, location, venographic appearance, and association with adjacent venous and osseous structures are documented.

RESULTS: A defect in the dura of the SSS was seen in all of the cases communicating with the subjacent subarachnoid space. The average size of the AG was 8.1 x 9.4 x 10.0 mm (range, 4–19 mm). Ten produced calvarial remodeling, and 11 were in the direct vicinity of the lambda. On T2-weighted images, all were hyperintense to the brain. On T1-weighted images, 8 were hypointense and 4 were hypointense with mixed areas of isointense signal intensity. All of the AGs were associated with cortical venous structures entering the sinus. On MR venography, AGs appeared as focal protrusions into the sinus, displacing, distorting, and narrowing the sinus lumen. Seven patients had headache without other visible cause on MR imaging, and 4 were initially interpreted as thrombosis or tumor.

CONCLUSION: Large AGs can occur in the dorsal SSS. They are well-defined projections of the subarachnoid space into the sinus, can cause luminal narrowing and calvarial remodeling, and have typical signal intensity characteristics, position, and morphology differentiating them from other pathology. Association with patient symptoms is uncertain.