AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published July 24, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:42.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1132v1
30/1/42    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, L.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ma, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, L.E.

HEAD & NECK

Improving Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Imaging of the Head and Neck with Two Fast Spin-Echo Dixon Techniques: Initial Experiences

J. Ma, E.F. Jackson, A.J. Kumar and L.E. Ginsberg

From the Departments of Imaging Physics (J.M., E.F.J.) and Diagnostic Radiology (A.J.K., L.E.G.), University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.

Please address correspondence to Jingfei Ma, PhD, Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Box 56, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: jma{at}di.mdacc.tmc.edu

SUMMARY: Two modified fast spin-echo (FSE) techniques (a 2-point and a single-scan triple-echo Dixon) were used for T2-weighted imaging of the head and neck in 7 patients along with conventional FSE with fat saturation. Both Dixon techniques provided consistent and more uniform fat suppression (FS) than conventional FSE. The 2-point Dixon technique was noted to be more susceptible to motion artifacts. The triple-echo Dixon technique offered the best scan time efficiency and overall image quality.