Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published September 3, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:155.

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: ajnr.A1293v1 30/1/155    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nauer, C.B. Articles by Gralla, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nauer, C.B. Articles by Gralla, J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.A1293

BRAIN

Effective Doses from Scan Projection Radiographs of the Head: Impact of Different Scanning Practices and Comparison with Conventional Radiography

C.B. Nauer, F. Kellner-Weldon, G. Von Allmen, D. Schaller and J. Gralla

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (C.B.N., F.K.-W., D.S., J.G.) and the Institute for Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology (G.V.A.), University Hospital and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

Please address correspondence to Claude B. Nauer, MD, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital/University Hospital, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland; e-mail: claude.nauer{at}insel.ch

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For CT scan planning, scan projection radiographs (SPR) are used. Tube tension and current for head SPR can be reduced to a minimum because of the small head diameter and because only high-contrast structures need to be visualized for planning. The goal of this study was to investigate SPR of the head in respect to effective doses, the influence of dose-reduction measures, and comparison with conventional x-ray.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Entrance doses for default and minimal settings were measured on a LightSpeed Ultra CT scanner and on conventional x-ray equipment. Effective doses for different scanning fields of the head were calculated for an adult, a 10-year-old child, and a neonate by using the commercially available software PCXMC.

RESULTS: Depending on projection and technique, SPR effective doses for adults were 1.9–27.7 µSv; for the 10-year-old child, 2.1–31.1 µSv; and for the neonate, 5.2–97.2 µSv. Doses with the tube under the table were 1.3–3.4 times lower. Doses for conventional radiography were higher than SPR doses for adults and partially lower for children.

CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the scanning technique, effective doses for head SPR can differ up to 17-fold. The dose is significantly reduced by lowering tube voltage and current, by positioning the tube under the table, and by keeping the thyroid out of the scan or by protecting it with a lead collar. Compared with the conventional x-ray technique, SPR doses tend to be lower due to x-ray beam characteristics.