AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published November 11, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:136.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1307v1
30/1/136    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, C.A.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, C.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rojas, C.A.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez, C.R.

SPINE

Normal Thickness and Appearance of the Prevertebral Soft Tissues on Multidetector CT

C.A. Rojas, D. Vermess, J.C. Bertozzi, J. Whitlow, C. Guidi and C.R. Martinez

From the Departments of Radiology (C.A.R., D.V., J.C.B., C.R.M.), University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Fla; and Department of Neurosurgery (J.W.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky. C.G. is in the process of applying to medical school.

Please address correspondence to Carlos A. Rojas, M., 5225 Bayshore Blvd, Tampa, FL 33611; e-mail: crojas{at}health.usf.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Analysis of the prevertebral soft tissue (PVST) is helpful in detecting osseous and ligamentous injuries of the cervical spine. Because the standard of care has shifted from radiographs to multidetector CT (MDCT), a re-examination of the PVST on MDCT images is needed to establish normal values for thickness appropriate for this imaging technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thickness of the PVST was measured in 192 patients undergoing screening cervical spine MDCT with multiplanar reconstructions as part of a trauma protocol. Patients included in the study were not intubated, had an immobilized cervical spine, had normal findings on cervical spine CT, and did not have a diagnosis of osseous or soft-tissue cervical injury. Exclusion criteria included patients with a congenital or acquired (nondegenerative) abnormality of the cervical spine or PVST.

RESULTS: The upper limits of normal for the thickness of the PVST were 8.5 mm at C1, 6 mm at C2, 7 mm at C3, 18 mm at C6, and 18 mm at C7. The upper limit of normal was not determined for C4 and C5 levels due to variable position of the esophagus and larynx. The smallest variability and calculated SDs were found at C2 and C3.

CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of the PVST is important in the detection of underlying injuries to the cervical spine. We propose the obtained values as the upper limits of normal for PVST thickness on MDCT images in the adult population.