AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published October 8, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:71.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1317v1
30/1/71    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, Y.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Ko, Y.-H.

HEAD & NECK

Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma of the Head and Neck: CT and MR Imaging Findings

S.-W. Park, H.-J. Kim, J.H. Lee and Y.-H. Ko

From the Department of Radiology (S.-W.P.), Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea; Departments of Radiology (H.-J.K.) and Pathology (Y.-H.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (J.H.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Please address correspondence to Hyung-Jin Kim, MD, Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, Korea; e-mail: hyungkim{at}skku.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is uncommon in the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to investigate CT and MR imaging features of 13 cases of MFH of this area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two head and neck radiologists, in consensus, retrospectively reviewed CT (n = 11) and MR (n = 9) images in 13 patients (9 men and 4 women; mean age, 45 years) with histologically proved MFH of the head and neck, paying attention to the location and extent, size, margin, internal architecture, and pattern and degree of enhancement of the lesion. We also investigated if there were any differences in signal-intensity characteristics on MR images, according to different histologic subtypes.

RESULTS: All lesions were seen as well-defined (n = 2) or ill-defined (n = 11), aggressive masses with a mean size of 4.9 cm. The tumors were primarily located in the sinonasal cavity in 6, the soft tissue of the face and neck in 5, the oral cavity in 1, and the orbital roof in 1. One lesion arose in the bones with background fibrous dysplasia. Twelve lesions invaded the adjacent soft tissues, and bone destruction was seen in 11 lesions. The attenuation, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern of the lesions were nonspecific except for those of myxoid MFH.

CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, MFH of the head and neck is an aggressive tumor that arises most commonly in the sinonasal tract and is frequently associated with soft-tissue invasion and bone destruction on CT and MR images.