AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published October 14, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:318.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1328v1
30/2/318    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gray, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gray, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D.F.

SPINE

Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Multiple Synchronous and Metachronous Vertebral Compression Fractures

L.A. Gray, A.Ehteshami Rad, J.R. Gaughen, Jr., T.J. Kaufmann and D.F. Kallmes

From the Department of Radiology (L.A.G., A.E.R., T.J.K., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; and the Department of Radiology (J.R.G.), University of Virginia Health Services, Charlottesville, Va.

Please address correspondence to David F. Kallmes, MD, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: kallmes.david{at}mayo.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for multiple synchronous and metachronous vertebral compression fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the number of vertebral levels treated during percutaneous vertebroplasty procedures or the number of separate vertebroplasty procedures performed on a given patient affect clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We defined 3 patient populations in our retrospective study. Group 1 included 328 patients who underwent 1 single-level vertebroplasty procedure. Group 2 included 226 patients who underwent a single procedure in which 2 or more vertebral levels were treated. Group 3 included 101 patients who underwent 2 or more separate vertebroplasty procedures. Follow-up was performed between 1 week and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed through analysis of quantitative measurements of pre- and postoperative levels of pain with and without activity (0–10) as well as mobility improvement. The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to evaluate the differences among groups. Univariate and {chi}2 analyses were performed to show the proportion of underlying diseases in each group.

RESULTS: Mean pain improvement with/without activity at 2-year follow-up was 5.8/3, 4.9/3.7, and 5.4/3.1 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; and mean mobility improvement in 2-year follow-up was 0.67, 0.63, and 0.65 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in pain relief and mobility improvement in patients treated for multiple synchronous or metachronous vertebral compression fractures in comparison with those treated for solitary isolated fractures.