AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

Publication Preview: Published November 27, 2008

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009;30:473.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ajnr.A1407v1
30/3/473    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piñero, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gil-Peralta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piñero, P.
Right arrow Articles by Gil-Peralta, A.

INTERVENTIONAL

Volume and Composition of Emboli in Neuroprotected Stenting of the Carotid Artery

P. Piñero, A. González, E. Martínez, A. Mayol, E. Rafel, J.R. González-Marcos, F. Moniche, A. Cayuela and A. Gil-Peralta

From the Departments of Diagnostic Neuroradiology (P.P.), Interventional Neuroradiology (A.G., A.M.), Neurology (F.M., J.R.G.-M., A.G.-P.), Pathology (E.R.), and Medical Records (A.C.), Virgen del Rocio University Hospitals, Seville, Spain; and Department of Neurology (E.M.), Infanta Elena Hospital, Huelva, Spain.

Please address correspondence to Pilar Piñero, PhD, Calle Gerardo Diego, n°9, portal 1, 2°D, Seville 41013, Spain; e-mail: pilarpingo{at}telefonica.net

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Periprocedural microembolization is a major and permanent risk for patients treated by angioplasty and stent placement of high-grade carotid stenoses. Little is known however about the characteristics and significance of these embolized particles. Our aim was to assess the volume and composition of debris captured by filters during carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) of severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent from all subjects were obtained. Two hundred one patients (mean age, 66.2 years; range, 35–82 years) with ≥70% stenosis of the ICA underwent filter-protected CAS. Ultrastructural and semiquantitative analysis of the volume of filters was obtained. Multifactorial statistical analysis was performed to determine factors related to debris volume and composition.

RESULTS: Transient ischemic attack occurred in 6 patients (3%), and a major stroke, in 1 (0.5%). Debris was found in 117 filters (58.2%), with volume <1 {lambda} (0.001 mL) in 71%. The number of balloon dilations, age older than 65 years, and calcified plaques in pre-CAS angiography were significantly associated with the presence of particulates inside the filters (P < .03, P < .004, and P < .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Vessel wall and atheromatous plaques are the main source of microemboli during CAS. Embolization is mainly related to the number of balloon dilations during CAS. Planning a proper and individualized strategy for the procedure in each patient is essential to minimize the potential effects of manipulation during CAS.