Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleArticles

Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an MR Contrast Agent: Evaluation in Patients with Cerebral Lesions

Eric J. Russell, Thomas F. Schaible, William Dillon, Burton Drayer, Joseph LiPuma, Anthony Mancuso, Kenneth Maravilla and Harold A. Goldstein
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 1989, 10 (1) 53-63;
Eric J. Russell
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Medical School, Olson Pavilion, 710 N. Fairbanks Ct., Chicago, IL 60611. Address reprint requests to E. J. Russell.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas F. Schaible
Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Dillon
Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143-0638.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Burton Drayer
Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph LiPuma
Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH 44106.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Mancuso
Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Maravilla
Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harold A. Goldstein
Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Cedar Knolls, NJ 07927.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A multicenter double-blind randomized study was designed to evaluate and compare the safety and diagnostic efficacy of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) (0.1 mmol/kg) against a saline placebo for use as an IV contrast agent for MR. The randomization code provided for a 2:1 ratio of Gd-DTPA and saline patients. Six investigators studied 88 patients with signs and symptoms of a cerebral lesion. Although safety data were complete in all 88 cases, only 83 had valid efficacy data (57 received Gd-DTPA, 26 placebo). Three patients were excluded from efficacy evaluation because of incomplete scans or scans with severe motion artifacts. Two patients were excluded for protocol variations (did not have a mass lesion). The protocol required that spin-echo MR images be acquired both before and after infusion at mode 1, 500/30/2 (TR/TE/excitations), and at a single-echo mode 2 sequence within a selected range, 1500-2000/56-90/2. Additional TEs could also be used at the discretion of each investigator. Efficacy was determined by comparing post- with preinjection images for relative degree of enhancement and improvement of diagnostic ability after injection, and by comparing these results with placebo results. Enhancement was reported in 43 (75%) of 57 Gd-DTPA patients and in none of the 26 placebo patients. Improvement of diagnostic ability was noted in 37 of 57 Gd-DTPA patients and in no placebo patients. Of 17 patients receiving Gd-DTPA for whom no diagnosis could be made before infusion, nine of 17 were diagnosed after infusion. By comparison, none of five patients not diagnosed before infusion of placebo could be diagnosed after infusion. Of 43 patients in whom lesion enhancement was observed after Gd-DTPA infusion, the diagnosis changed after infusion in 16 (37%) and the number of lesions detected after infusion increased in 10 (23%). Safety studies showed no clinically significant abnormal trends. Minor changes in blood pressure, pulse, and serum iron levels were noted in a higher percentage of Gd-DTPA patients.

This study confirms that Gd-DTPA is an efficacious contrast agent for use with MR and that it exhibits excellent patient tolerance. Enhancement allows for a decisive diagnosis to be made in selected cases in which such capability had previously been lacking with unenhanced MR.

  • © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 10, Issue 1
1 Jan 1989
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an MR Contrast Agent: Evaluation in Patients with Cerebral Lesions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
Citation Tools
Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an MR Contrast Agent: Evaluation in Patients with Cerebral Lesions
Eric J. Russell, Thomas F. Schaible, William Dillon, Burton Drayer, Joseph LiPuma, Anthony Mancuso, Kenneth Maravilla, Harold A. Goldstein
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 1989, 10 (1) 53-63;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an MR Contrast Agent: Evaluation in Patients with Cerebral Lesions
Eric J. Russell, Thomas F. Schaible, William Dillon, Burton Drayer, Joseph LiPuma, Anthony Mancuso, Kenneth Maravilla, Harold A. Goldstein
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 1989, 10 (1) 53-63;
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (19)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • External Carotid Artery Embolization
  • Mechanical and Pharmocologic Treatment of Vasospasm
  • Head, Neck, and Brain Tumor Embolization
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • 2016 Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2016 Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Position Statements
  • ASNR Fellowship Portal
  • Librarian Resources

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat
  • CME for Literature Searches Now Free
  • ASNR Annual Meeting

Other Publications

  • AJNR News Digest
  • AJNR Blog
  • Neurographics

© 2017 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire