Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Abstract

Diffusion-weighted MR of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of data processing methods.

J Chong, D Lu, F Aragao, M B Singer, W J Schonewille, A Silvers, S Tuhrim and S W Atlas
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 1998, 19 (9) 1733-1739;
J Chong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Lu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F Aragao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M B Singer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W J Schonewille
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Silvers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Tuhrim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S W Atlas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Some investigators have proposed that either calculated diffusion trace images or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, which require imaging with multiple diffusion sensitivities and/or postacquisition image processing, are essential for the accurate interpretation of diffusion-weighted images in acute stroke because of the possible pitfalls of regional diffusion anisotropy, magnetic susceptibility artifacts, and confounding T2 effects, all of which alter signal on diffusion-weighted MR images. The purpose of our study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of simple, orthogonal-axis diffusion-weighted imaging for the diagnosis of early cerebral infarction with three other sets of postacquisition-processed images: isotropic diffusion-weighted, diffusion trace-weighted, and diffusion trace images.

METHODS Twenty-six consecutive adult patients with signs and symptoms consistent with a clinical diagnosis of early cortical and/or subcortical cerebral infarction and 17 control subjects were studied with multisection, single-shot, spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5 T to generate a set of three orthogonal-axis diffusion-weighted images. Isotropic diffusion-weighted, diffusion trace-weighted, and diffusion trace (mean ADC) images were then generated off-line and all four sets of images were interpreted blindly by two neuroradiologists.

RESULTS The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the orthogonal-axis diffusion-weighted images were 98.1%, 97.1%, and 97.7%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for isotropic diffusion-weighted images were 88.5%, 100%, and 93% respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diffusion trace-weighted images were 82.7%, 73.6%, and 79.1%, respectively. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diffusion trace images were 50.0%, 85.3%, and 64.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION Orthogonal-axis diffusion-weighted images have the highest sensitivity and accuracy and very high specificity for early cerebral infarction. Our data contradict the contention that quantitative diffusion maps, requiring imaging with multiple diffusion sensitivities and/or subsequent image processing, are necessary for clinical stroke imaging.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 19, Issue 9
1 Oct 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffusion-weighted MR of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of data processing methods.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diffusion-weighted MR of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of data processing methods.
J Chong, D Lu, F Aragao, M B Singer, W J Schonewille, A Silvers, S Tuhrim, S W Atlas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1998, 19 (9) 1733-1739;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diffusion-weighted MR of acute cerebral infarction: comparison of data processing methods.
J Chong, D Lu, F Aragao, M B Singer, W J Schonewille, A Silvers, S Tuhrim, S W Atlas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 1998, 19 (9) 1733-1739;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Ventral Premotor Cortex May Be Required for Dynamic Changes in the Feeling of Limb Ownership: A Lesion Study
  • Evolution of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, Diffusion-weighted, and T2-weighted Signal Intensity of Acute Stroke
  • High-b-value Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of Adult Brain: Image Contrast and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map Features
  • Systematic Review of Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Incidence of Postangiographic Abnormalities Revealed by Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
  • Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke Missed by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire