Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

MR of the Spine in the Presence of Metallic Bullet Fragments: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?

Stephanos N. Finitsis, Steven Falcone and Barth A. Green
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 1999, 20 (2) 354;
Stephanos N. Finitsis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Falcone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barth A. Green
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In general, radiologists are reluctant to perform MR imaging for patients with retained metallic bullet fragments (1–3). This reluctance is heightened for those patients with retained fragments near vital and susceptible anatomic structures such as the spinal cord. This issue led us to review the medical records of 19 patients (December 1991 to May 1996) at our institution who had retained metallic fragments (presumed lead) in the region of the spine, and who were studied with MR imaging. This study was done to assess whether the information obtained from the images could justify the potential hazards related to the procedure.

There were retained metallic fragments in the cervical spine in six patients, the thoracic spine in eight patients, and the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine in two and three patients, respectively. Fifteen patients had retained bullet fragments larger than 1 cm (mean, 1.5 cm), four were inside the spinal canal, six were embedded in the spinal bony structures, and five were in the paraspinal region. Three smaller metallic fragments (0.4–0.9 cm) were located in the paraspinal soft tissues. Metallic fragments smaller than 0.4 cm were located inside the spinal canal in six patients, in the bony spinal structures in six patients, and in the paraspinal region in six patients. Six patients were quadriplegic and 12 were paraplegic; these conditions were unrelated to the history of gunshot wound injury. MR examinations were performed within 3 weeks after the time of injury in six patients while in the remaining 13, a time period of 1 month to 6 years had elapsed.

MR imaging was performed at either a 1.0 or 1.5 T with T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient echo images in the sagittal and axial plane. Additional sagittal or axial T2-weighted spin-echo and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences were performed in six and four patients, respectively. None of the patients imaged had retained metallic fragments. Fragments, such as the ball-bearing or Prometheus type of air gun pellets, have been shown to be strongly ferromagnetic (4).

All procedures were performed without the patients experiencing any untoward effect. All metallic foreign bodies showed mild artifact (1) approximately the same size as the metallic object imaged. In two cases, however, metallic fragments smaller than 0.4 cm were confirmed by plain radiography or CT, but were not visible on the MR images. This led to the conclusion that these bullet fragments were not ferromagnetic (1).

MR studies established diagnoses in 27 patients (five acute/subacute and 12 chronic). In those two cases in which the MR image was deemed suboptimal, artifact precluded exclusion of a spinal lesion in the region of interest. Imaging artifacts in these two patients were the result of multiple small metallic fragments associated with a dominant (>1 cm) metallic fragment. In the six recently injured patients, two had a cord contusion and two had an epidural hematoma with cord compression that was subsequently treated surgically. One patient had no identifiable lesion and one had a nondiagnostic study owing to extensive artifacts induced by the metallic fragments. In the 13 chronically injured patients, four studies yielded negative results for cyst, scarring, atrophy, or a compressive lesion. Atrophy and myelomalacia were identified in six patients, one of whom had a small nonsurgical extramedullary cyst. One patient had a bullet embedded in a cord with a cyst above and below it, and one patient was diagnosed with an epidural abscess that was subsequently treated surgically. One study was nondiagnostic because of extensive metallic artifact.

On the basis of our experience, we support the use of MR imaging for patients with retained metallic ballistic fragments in the region of the spine; the information we gained would have been difficult to obtain with other imaging techniques. Certainly, as with any patient with a metallic implant or any potentially hazardous medical device, serious consideration should be given to determine which (if any) of these patients should enter the MR environment. Results obtained from MR led to surgical intervention in three of 19 patients. No untoward effects were seen.

References

  1. ↵
    Teitelbaum GP, Yee CA, VanHorn DD, ,et al. Metallic ballistic fragments: imaging safety and artifacts. Radiology 1990;175:855-859
    PubMed
  2. Pohost GM, Black GG, Shellock FG. Safety of patients with medical devices during application of magnetic resonance methods: biological effects and safety aspects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Acad Sci 1992;302-312
  3. Shellock FG, Kanal E. SMRI Safety Committee: policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:97-101
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Oliver C, Kabala J. Air gun pellet injuries: the safety of MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1997;52:299-300
    PubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 2
1 Feb 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR of the Spine in the Presence of Metallic Bullet Fragments: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MR of the Spine in the Presence of Metallic Bullet Fragments: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?
Stephanos N. Finitsis, Steven Falcone, Barth A. Green
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 354;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MR of the Spine in the Presence of Metallic Bullet Fragments: Is the Benefit Worth the Risk?
Stephanos N. Finitsis, Steven Falcone, Barth A. Green
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 354;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Regarding “Rates of Epidural Blood Patch following Lumbar Puncture Comparing Atraumatic versus Bevel-Tip Needles Stratified for Body Mass Index”
  • CAA-ri and ARIA: Two Faces of the Same Coin?
  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire