Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Back to the Future: Epidurography

David W. Johnson M.D
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 1999, 20 (4) 537-538;
David W. Johnson M.D
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of the AJNR, Johnson (no relation) et al (page 697) describe their experience with the use of fluoroscopy and epidurography in the placement of epidural steroids. The authors assert that the subarachnoid injection of corticosteroids is a serious complication that can be avoided with the use of epidurography. A series of 5334 outpatient epidural steroid injections were performed after epidurography with nonionic contrast to confirm needle tip position. Only four minor complications were encountered (0.07%), and the dura was never transgressed.

At first glance, presenting such conclusions regarding the use of fluoroscopy and nonionic contrast to the readership of the AJNR would be like Jerry Falwell preaching to the choir. Why bother? Furthermore, most radiologists, neuro- and otherwise, are doing fewer myelograms with the firm establishment of MR as the primary imaging technique for the diagnosis of spinal disease. And when was the last time anyone intentionally did an epidurogram? Remember Thorotrast?

Before you treat the conclusions of this paper too lightly, consider this. For many years spinal injection therapy has been the purview of the anesthesiologists. Their familiarity with blind epidural needle placement for epidural anesthesia has made them the natural choice for placement of other spinal medication.

Yet, spinal injection is an enlarging field in neuro- (and orthopedic-) radiology. Work is beginning to emerge in our journal (1), and the role of the neuroradiologist in dealing with back pain is growing (2). There is a debate going on among those who perform spinal injection procedures, and I believe it reflects the differing nature of their training as anesthesiologists or as radiologists. Is fluoroscopy medically necessary for the performance of translaminar (interlaminar) lumbar epidural steroid injections? For a more careful review of this issue, I recommend you visit the following website:

http://www.spinalinjection.com/newsltrs/nl1997j/contro.htm.

In the above-cited debate, Dr. Eckman, who supports fluoroscopy, eludes to the further usefulness of epidurography and Johnson et al take epidurography to its logical conclusion. Even though Johnson's series was not constructed with control and experimental groups, it becomes obvious nevertheless that their complication rate is very low. Because the number of complications in this study are few, one may assume this follows a Poisson distribution. A Poisson distribution is a probability distribution for the number of outcomes occurring during a given time interval or in a specified region. The number of outcomes that occur in one interval is independent of the number that will occur in any other interval. In an attempt to answer the question how many complications might occur in the next 5300 procedures, one could calculate a 95% confidence interval. A 95% confidence interval on a complication rate of .07% over 5300 patients ranges from .02% to .19%. That means there is a 95% likelihood that in the next 5300 patients there will be a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 11 minor complications. This means the complication rate is still very low, and it still remains to be seen what may be the complication rate of dural tap with epidurography, but it should be lower. The most recent reference I could find regarding dural tap complication rate without fluoroscopy quoted a rate of about 0.5% (3). This lies well outside the 95% confidence interval for Johnson's results.

Baby boomers are getting older, the incidence of back pain is increasing, and more of these procedures will be done in the future. These (I should say we) are some of the most informed patients we encounter in our practices. They will expect a high-tech approach to spinal injection, and will demand a greater accountability in the success or failure of the procedure. Fluoroscopy and epidurography should enhance the efficacy of epidural steroid injection, and lower the risk of dural tap. Radiologists trained in the use of fluoroscopy and epidurography can meet this growing need.

References

  1. ↵
    Zennaro H, Dousset V, Viaoud B, Allard M, Dehais J, Senegas J, Caille JM. Periganglionic foraminal steroid injections performed under CT control. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:349-352
    Abstract
  2. ↵
    Murtaugh FR. The neuroradiologist as pain therapist. Editorial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:353
  3. ↵
    Warfield CA, Principles and Practice of Pain Management.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1993;401-412
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 4
1 Apr 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Back to the Future: Epidurography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Back to the Future: Epidurography
David W. Johnson M.D
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 1999, 20 (4) 537-538;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Back to the Future: Epidurography
David W. Johnson M.D
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 1999, 20 (4) 537-538;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Insights into the AJNR Review Process
  • Novel Coronavirus: What Neuroradiologists as Citizens of the World Need to Know
  • Neuroradiology Fellowship Requirements: Updates in 2019
Show more EDITORIAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire