Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleEDITORIAL

Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Spinal Cord: Is There a Future?

Robert M. Quencer and Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2000, 21 (7) 1181-1182;
Robert M. Quencer
Roles: Editor-in-Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pradip M. Pattany
Roles: University of MiamiMiami, FL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

MR imaging of the brain has benefited over the past few years by the routine use of a number of innovative pulse sequences, prominent among which has been diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The efficacy of this technique, well known to virtually all radiologists, has found its greatest use in the evaluation of cerebral ischemia, although application to other brain abnormalities has been shown in numerous publications. The incremental information that DWI brings to brain imaging is formidable, so naturally the desire would be to add DWI to the MR study of a patient with spinal cord dysfunction. One could envision many situations in which DWI would be extremely helpful, both in terms of diagnosis and evaluation of the efficacy of medical and surgical treatment. Clearly, spinal cord infarcts resulting from either arterial or venous abnormalities come to mind first, not just because their cerebral counterparts can be identified so well, but because cord infarct/ischemia is frequently a difficult diagnosis to make on the basis of MR findings. Other entities, such as acute transverse myelopathy, Wallerian degeneration, or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis might be diagnosed earlier and characterized better if proper technical parameters for obtaining spinal cord DWI and calculations of apparent diffusion coefficients could be achieved. Unfortunately, there are many technical and physiologic problems to overcome before DWI of the spinal cord becomes an accepted and routinely used protocol.

In this issue of the AJNR, Robertson et al (page 1344) describe their work on line-scan diffusion imaging of the spinal cord in 12 children, and in three cases they compare line-diffusion scanning with echo-planar diffusion imaging (EPDI). As one might expect, line scanning resulted in a better signal-to-noise ratio, and there were diminished magnetic susceptibility effects. The wide range of relative anisotropy in the normal cords is explained by both the curved nature of the spinal cord relative to the orthogonal diffusion-gradient axes, as well as the averaging of gray and white matter in their measurements. With this article in mind, and with an increased interest in cord DWI, it is clear that a number of problems must be successfully dealt with before DWI of the cord becomes part of routine spine imaging. The inherent difficulties in obtaining high-quality DWI of the cord, and techniques for dealing with these problems, deserve comment.

A major difficulty in obtaining DWI of the cord is physiologic motion, particularly CSF flow, which causes imaging artifacts. A number of strategies can be employed to overcome the artifacts that pulsating CSF generates, including novel means of data acquisition such as the navigator-echo or line-scanning technique, fast imaging methods such as single-shot EPDI or single-shot fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging, and cardiac gating. Problems exist, however, with each of these strategies. Specifically, when cardiac gating is used, the examination time is extended because only a limited number of images are acquired when cord motion is minimal (ie, during diastole). When the navigator-echo method with fast imaging or line scanning is used, lower signal is obtained. Finally, when EPDI is used, magnetic susceptibility artifacts and low spatial resolution of this relatively small structure result in suboptimal image quality.

The navigator-echo method, which uses an extra spin-echo sequence with no spatial phase encoding, provides phase shift information due to bulk motion, and these data are used to correct for phase shifts before the images are reconstructed. In addition, when the navigator-echo technique is used in conjunction with cardiac gating, diffusion-weighted images can be acquired throughout the entire cardiac cycle, not just during minimal motion, and this reduces scan time. Despite the advantages of the navigator-echo method and cardiac gating, the fast scanning techniques that are used in conjunction with them come with certain drawbacks. Specifically, EPDI, which uses multiple gradient echoes to acquire data, suffers from local susceptibility artifacts. This problem can be overcome by the use of a single-shot FSE sequence, which uses 180° refocusing pulses, rendering it less sensitive to artifacts caused by local magnetic field variations. With both single-shot FSE and EPDI, however, broad receiver bandwidths are used, which diminish the signal-to-noise ratio.

Line scanning differs in a number of ways from the conventional 2D Fourier transform imaging methods. This spin-echo–based technique acquires data from individually excited columns (or lines), and because no phase-encoding gradient is needed, artifacts due to physiologic motions are minimized. In addition, because line scanning uses a spin-echo rather than a gradient-based sequence (EPDI), susceptibility artifacts are minimized. Despite these advantages, an adequate signal-to-noise ratio is a problem in line scanning because data are received from just one column (line) of tissue rather than from an entire slice of tissue.

When one considers the issue of spatial resolution and the desire to image a patient's spinal cord with a resolution that approaches in vitro cord imaging, the problem of insufficient signal is clear. It may be that, with 1.5-T scanners and the current generation of receiver coils, none of the above-mentioned techniques offers the high signal and resulting image quality that would allow DWI of the cord to be widely and routinely implemented.

The answer to this dilemma of adequate signal combined with reasonable spatial resolution in DWI may require a rethinking of our approach to “physiologically based” images of the spinal cord. Specifically, in addition to innovative acquisition techniques or faster scanning, high field strength systems (3T or higher), different types of receiver cord design, or both eventually may be a successful approach. More signal from such system redesign may be the approach needed to give DWI of the spinal cord a future.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 7
1 Aug 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Spinal Cord: Is There a Future?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Spinal Cord: Is There a Future?
Robert M. Quencer, Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2000, 21 (7) 1181-1182;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Spinal Cord: Is There a Future?
Robert M. Quencer, Pradip M. Pattany
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2000, 21 (7) 1181-1182;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The No Surprises Act: What Neuroradiologists Should Know
  • Call to Action: Women in Neuroradiology’s Group (WINNERS)—Is There a Need?
  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire