Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLETTER

Contrast-enhanced Spiral CT of the Head and Neck

Lawrence E. Ginsberg
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2000, 21 (7) 1365-000;
Lawrence E. Ginsberg
aAssociate ProfessorRadiology and Head and Neck SurgeryMD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The article by Groell et al (1) concerning contrast injection rates in head and neck CT raises several important issues that deserve further dialogue. I am in complete agreement with the authors that adequate opacification of the cervical vessels is crucial, and a cornerstone of high-quality head and neck CT. Outside studies referred to our institution for interpretation are frequently suboptimal in this regard. There is no mention in the Methods sections of the Groell article of angulation of the gantry so as to avoid the dental fillings found in many patients. In my opinion, this is of critical importance in obtaining a good head and neck CT study and something that is very often overlooked, to the detriment of the examination.

The optimal injection rate/volume established by the authors would not work if they were to angle around the fillings. They would run out of contrast material, and therefore I take exception to their conclusions and fear that to adopt them might lead to suboptimal imaging. At the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center we scan as follows: the scans are obtained from inferior to superior (the extra few seconds it takes to get up to the oral cavity is thought to facilitate better delivery of contrast material to those structures and thus better lesion visualization). We start with an initial bolus of 75 cc of 320 mg IV contrast material at an injection rate of 1.5cc/s and begin scanning after a 50-second delay. At the bottom of the dental fillings, we stop scanning and reangle the gantry, a process that takes approximately 60–80 seconds. During this reangling, we give an additional bolus of 50 cc at a rate of 1cc/s. This extra contrast material assures adequate opacification of the vasculature as the upper neck and skull base are scanned. This protocol works very well for us and is quite reproducible. Obviously the iodine dose is higher (40 g vs 30 g), but in order to have good vascular opacification and avoid dental fillings, more contrast material must be administered.

Reference

  1. ↵
    Groell R, Willfurth P, Schaffler G, et al. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the head and neck: comparison of contrast material injection rates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1732-1736
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 7
1 Aug 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contrast-enhanced Spiral CT of the Head and Neck
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Contrast-enhanced Spiral CT of the Head and Neck
Lawrence E. Ginsberg
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2000, 21 (7) 1365-000;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Contrast-enhanced Spiral CT of the Head and Neck
Lawrence E. Ginsberg
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2000, 21 (7) 1365-000;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fair Performance of CT in Diagnosing Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Reply:
  • Regarding “Altered Blood Flow in the Ophthalmic and Internal Carotid Arteries in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured Using Noncontrast MR Angiography at 7T”
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire