Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

Measuring the Effect of Novel Therapies for Back Pain

Victor M. Haughton and Jason Fine
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2003, 24 (5) 784-787;
Victor M. Haughton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Fine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Deyo R. Practice variations, treatment fads, rising disability: do we need a new clinical research paradigm?Spine 1993;18:2153–2162
    PubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Hoffman RM, Turner JA, Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Herron LD. Therapeutic trials for low back pain.Spine 1994;19:2068S–2075S
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Weber H. Lumbar disk herniation: a controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation.Spine 1983;8:131–140
    PubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Keller RB, Rudicel SA, Liang MH. Outcomes research in orthopaedics.Instr Course Lect 1994;43:599–611
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Deyo RA. Measuring functional status of patients with low back pain.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:1044–1053
    PubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Revel M, Payan C, Vallee C, et al. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy versus chemonucleolysis in the treatment of sciatica: a randomized multicenter trial.Spine 1993;18:1–7
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Weber H. The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention.Spine 1994;19:2234–2238
    PubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Loisel P, Vachon B, Lemaire J, et al. Discriminative and predictive validity assessment of the Quebec Task Force classification.Spine 2002;27:851–857
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    [No authors listed]. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians: report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders.Spine 1987;12[suppl]:S1–S59
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain.J Rheumatol 1988;15:1557–1564
    PubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Keller RB. Pro: outcomes research is cost effective and critical to the specialty.Spine 1995;20:384–386
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Rasmussen FO, Amundsen T, Vandvik B. Lumbar disk prolapses and radiologic spinal intervention: what do the randomized controlled trials say? [in Norwegian]Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1998;118:2470–2480
  13. ↵
    Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Cleary J. Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.Eur Spine J 2000;9:202–207
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 5
1 May 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring the Effect of Novel Therapies for Back Pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Measuring the Effect of Novel Therapies for Back Pain
Victor M. Haughton, Jason Fine
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2003, 24 (5) 784-787;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measuring the Effect of Novel Therapies for Back Pain
Victor M. Haughton, Jason Fine
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2003, 24 (5) 784-787;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • The Z-Shift: A Need for Quality Management System Level Testing and Standardization in Neuroimaging Pipelines
  • Digital Didactics: Introducing the New ASNR Neuroradiology Fellowship Curriculum
  • Insights into the AJNR Review Process
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2021 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2022 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire