Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
EditorialEDITORIAL

The High-Field-Strength Curmudgeon

Jeffrey S. Ross
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2004, 25 (2) 168-169;
Jeffrey S. Ross
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Frayne R, Goodyear BG, Dickhoff P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Invest Radiol 2003;38:385–402
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ruggieri PM, Tkach J, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ. Routine clinical imaging at 3.0T: an oxymoron? Radiology 2002;225:430
  3. ↵
    Fujii Y, Nakayama N, Nakada T. High-resolution T2 reversed magnetic resonance imaging on high magnetic field system. J Neurosurg 1998;89:492–495
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Barker PB, Hearshen DO, Boska MD. Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T. Magn Res Med 2001;45:765–769
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Gonen O, Gruber S, Li BS, et al. Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5T versus 3.0T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1727–1731
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bernstein MA, Huston J III, Lin C, et al. High-resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: technical considerations and initial experience. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:955–962
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 2
1 Feb 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The High-Field-Strength Curmudgeon
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
Citation Tools
The High-Field-Strength Curmudgeon
Jeffrey S. Ross
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2004, 25 (2) 168-169;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The High-Field-Strength Curmudgeon
Jeffrey S. Ross
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2004, 25 (2) 168-169;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • High-Resolution 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging and 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Neurovascular Compression: A Comparison between 3T and 1.5T
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Neonatal Encephalopathy at 4.7 Tesla: Initial Experiences
  • Advantages and Pitfalls in 3T MR Brain Imaging: A Pictorial Review
  • Enhancing Gray-to-White Matter Contrast in 3T T1 Spin-Echo Brain Scans by Optimizing Flip Angle
  • 3T MR Imaging: The Pros and Cons
  • The Time for 3T Clinical Imaging Is Now
  • Scopus (29)
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Time to Discontinue Use of the Term “Hemorrhagic Stroke”
  • Women Rising to the Top: The Tipping Point for the ASNR
  • Do You Need a Coach? I Do
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • 2018 Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2019 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2019 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire