Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleBRAIN

Comparison of Image Quality Between Conventional and Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT

Mark E. Mullins, Michael H. Lev, Peter Bove, Cara E. O’Reilly, Sanjay Saini, James T. Rhea, James H. Thrall, George J. Hunter, Leena M. Hamberg and R. Gilberto Gonzalez
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2004, 25 (4) 533-538;
Mark E. Mullins
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael H. Lev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Bove
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cara E. O’Reilly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjay Saini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James T. Rhea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James H. Thrall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George J. Hunter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leena M. Hamberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Gilberto Gonzalez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Increasing use of CT for evaluating neurologic disease may expose patients to considerable levels of ionizing radiation. We compared the image quality of low-mAs head CT scans with that of conventional nonenhanced scans.

METHODS: Conventional head CT scans were obtained in 20 patients (all >65 years with history of non-CNS malignancy) by using a multidetector technique: 170 mA and 1-second scanning time (ie, 170 mAs), 140 kVp, table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation, pitch of 0.75, section thickness of 5 mm, and field of view of 25 mm. A limited volume helical data acquisition covering four 5-mm-thick images was obtained by using 90 mAs but otherwise the same parameters. Three neuroradiologists visually rated the resulting images for quality in a blinded comparison. Representative 1- to 4-mm2 regions of interest were chosen in gray matter and white matter locations. Conspicuity and the contrast-to-noise ratio were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were done by using the Student t test.

RESULTS: Mean gray matter conspicuity was not significantly different between the 170- and 90-mAs groups (0.39 ± 0.19 vs 0.41 ± 0.03, P = .32). Mean gray matter contrast-to-noise ratio was approximately 22% higher with 170 mAs than with 90 mAs (1.77 ± 0.52 vs 1.39 ± 0.38, P = .005). All 90-mAs images were rated as having slightly greater image noise than the 170-mAs scans but with sufficient perceived resolution.

CONCLUSION: Although 90-mAs head CT images were moderately noisier than 170-mAs images, they were rated as having acceptable diagnostic quality.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 4
1 Apr 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Image Quality Between Conventional and Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Image Quality Between Conventional and Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT
Mark E. Mullins, Michael H. Lev, Peter Bove, Cara E. O’Reilly, Sanjay Saini, James T. Rhea, James H. Thrall, George J. Hunter, Leena M. Hamberg, R. Gilberto Gonzalez
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2004, 25 (4) 533-538;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of Image Quality Between Conventional and Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT
Mark E. Mullins, Michael H. Lev, Peter Bove, Cara E. O’Reilly, Sanjay Saini, James T. Rhea, James H. Thrall, George J. Hunter, Leena M. Hamberg, R. Gilberto Gonzalez
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2004, 25 (4) 533-538;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • CT Radiation Dose and Image Quality Optimization Using a Porcine Model
  • Dose reduction and image quality in CT angiography for cerebralaneurysm with various tube potentials and current settings
  • Cranial CT with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Improved Image Quality with Concomitant Radiation Dose Reduction
  • Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection
  • Lowering the Dose in Head CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
  • Effect of Tube Voltage on Image Quality in 64-Section Multidetector 3D CT Angiography: Evaluation with a Vascular Phantom with Superimposed Bone Skull Structures
  • FDA Investigates the Safety of Brain Perfusion CT
  • Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography
  • 320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation
  • Multiphase CT Angiography versus Single-Phase CT Angiography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
  • Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire