Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleBRAIN

Dynamic Perfusion CT: Optimizing the Temporal Resolution and Contrast Volume for Calculation of Perfusion CT Parameters in Stroke Patients

Max Wintermark, Wade S. Smith, Nerissa U. Ko, Marcel Quist, Pierre Schnyder and William P. Dillon
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 720-729;
Max Wintermark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wade S. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nerissa U. Ko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcel Quist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Schnyder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William P. Dillon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Time-enhancement curves for four temporal sampling intervals: 0.5 second, 1 second, 2 seconds, and 4 seconds. The area under the curve is approximately the same for the first three sampling intervals. For the interval of 4 seconds, however, the peak points of the curve are undersampled (circle), resulting in a reduction in the area under the curve. This would result in significant errors in the calculation of rCBV.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Sample PCT datasets in one patient from the 40-mL group. rCBF, rCBV, MTT, and TTP maps are displayed for six sampling intervals: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 seconds. Sparsing sampling results in overestimation of rCBF, rCBV, and TTP values and in underestimation of MTT values.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Time to entrance of the contrast material into the arterial pixel and time to exit of the contrast material in the venous and ischemic pixels, displayed for the four bolus volume groups. Boxes represent the mean ± 1 SD, and vertical lines indicate the mean ± 2 SDs. Time to arterial entrance does not vary with bolus volumes. However, time to exit does increase with increasing bolus volumes, resulting in longer acquisition times required for larger bolus volumes.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    PCT rCBF values for the healthy hemisphere

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD45.0 ± 3.641.7 ± 3.743.3 ± 3.752.9 ± 4.671.1 ± 5.891.8 ± 15.5295.1 ± 87.0
     Range−2.9% to +10.7%NA−4.9% to +8.4%+2.6% to +28.3%+47.0% to +139.4%+84.2% to +170.1%+379.7% to +748.2%
     P value.038NA.239.001<.001<.001<.001
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD43.5 ± 3.843.1 ± 3.941.6 ± 3.947.0 ± 3.553.2 ± 6.879.4 ± 13.994.0 ± 24.3
     Range−5.9% to +7.9%NA−7.6% to +6.1%−2.8% to +9.6%+24.2% to +60.4%+59.8% to +113.0%+107.3% to +277.5%
     P value.759NA.344.052<.001<.001<.001
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD45.1 ± 3.043.7 ± 3.342.1 ± 3.544.7 ± 4.455.1 ± 5.464.8 ± 8.873.6 ± 17.5
     Range−4.0% to +7.2%NA−6.9% to +6.3%−5.4% to +8.2%+12.3% to +49.1%+44.9% to +81.5%+79.4% to +108.1%
     P value.276NA.248.494.001.001.001
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD45.7 ± 3.844.2 ± 3.741.6 ± 3.642.5 ± 3.847.6 ± 4.654.6 ± 6.460.4 ± 9.3
     Range−4.8% to +7.4%NA−8.0% to +5.7%−7.4% to +5.5%−4.0% to +11.0%+8.3% to +39.4%+22.7% to +47.7%
     P value.306NA.112.252.012.004.001
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .886, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for rCBF values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which rCBF values were significantly overestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    PCT rCBF values for the ischemic area

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD10.1 ± 4.711.7 ± 6.012.3 ± 6.124.4 ± 12.154.2 ± 27.4102.2 ± 50.2238.3 ± 188.0
     Range−9.2% to +17.3%NA−10.0% to +18.4%+18.1% to +126.3%+151.1% to +402.4%+513.7% to +991.1%+1183.9% to +2561.1%
     P value.450NA.803.004<.001<.001<.001
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD11.4 ± 5.112.9 ± 4.912.0 ± 5.113.8 ± 6.347.1 ± 23.385.9 ± 35.9194.8 ± 137.9
     Range−10.0% to +16.2%NA−9.4% to +17.4%−8.9% to +18.2%+115.1% to +319.9%+392.6% to +718.7%+946.0% to +1945.8%
     P value.958NA.653.683<.001<.001<.001
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD9.8 ± 4.911.3 ± 4.59.6 ± 4.111.4 ± 5.325.6 ± 12.247.1 ± 20.760.3 ± 31.8
     Range−10.6% to +18.1%NA−10.0% to +18.8%−9.5% to +19.8%+55.8% to +171.1%+251.6% to +439.4%+380.4% to +795.1%
     P value.494NA.393.939.001<.001<.001
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD9.6 ± 4.49.7 ± 4.49.3 ± 4.09.2 ± 4.310.6 ± 5.723.4 ± 12.029.6 ± 19.0
     Range−9.7% to +19.8%NA−9.6% to +19.2%−10.0% to +17.3%−8.9% to +18.6%+118.9% to +286.7%+136.9% to +324.7%
     P value.970NA.777.776.216.001.001
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .166, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for rCBF values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which rCBF values were significantly overestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3:

    PCT rCBV values for the healthy hemisphere

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD3.0 ± 0.42.8 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.43.0 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.74.8 ± 1.314.9 ± 4.8
     Range−6.5% to +8.0%NA−7.5% to +6.8%−6.2% to +9.2%+16.8% to +59.4%+52.5% to +99.1%+136.0% to +628.3%
     P value.213NA.700.124.004.002<.001
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD3.1 ± 0.53.0 ± 0.42.8 ± 0.43.2 ± 0.53.2 ± 0.64.3 ± 0.74.9 ± 1.2
     Range−5.8% to +7.1%NA−8.3% to +4.9%−5.8% to +7.4%−4.2% to +9.6%+18.0% to +69.3%+42.0% to +278.2%
     P value.225NA.595.0196.024<.001<.001
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD3.2 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.43.0 ± 0.33.3 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.8
     Range−7.2% to +6.2%NA−9.0% to +7.9%−7.4% to +8.3%−5.3% to +8.3%+7.9% to +41.6%+22.3% to +66.6%
     P value.708NA.243.494.139.008.007
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD3.2 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.42.9 ± 0.33.2 ± 0.43.3 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.5
     Range−6.5% to +8.0%NA−8.3% to +10.2%−8.1% to +9.0%−5.8% to +7.6%−4.8% to +9.6%+8.5% to +32.6%
     P value.230NA.650.420.324.038.007
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .908, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for rCBV values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which rCBV values were significantly overestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4:

    PCT rCBV values for the ischemic area

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD1.0 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.65.4 ± 1.512.1 ± 4.8
     Range−14.4% to +8.6%NA−10.2% to +8.5%+33.7% to +111.2%+104.2% to +335.0%+222.0% to +447.4%+630.5% to +1275.2%
     P value.018NA.519<.001<.001<.001<.001
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD1.1 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.43.2 ± 0.55.1 ± 0.910.9 ± 2.8
     Range−13.0% to +13.7%NA−10.5% to +8.1%−10.6% to +10.2%+53.0% to +220.5%+197.3% to +427.3%+510.8% to +937.3%
     P value.156NA.076.765<.001<.001<.001
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD0.9 ± 0.51.1 ± 0.31.0 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.62.3 ± 0.33.4 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.9
     Range−12.4% to +10.6%NA−8.1% to +8.5%−10.5% to +9.4%+33.5% to +122.3%+95.5% to +323.7%+249.7% to +435.4%
     P value.021NA.033.603<.001<.001<.001
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD1.0 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.50.9 ± 0.60.9 ± 0.41.1 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.32.4 ± 0.4
     Range−11.3% to +10.4%NA−7.2% to +7.2%−9.5% to +9.3%−11.8% to +12.1%+23.3% to +155.9%+97.9% to +228.1%
     P value.614NA.164.172.014<.001<.001
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .556, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for rCBV values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which rCBV values were significantly overestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5:

    PCT MTT values for the healthy hemisphere

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD4.0 ± 0.44.1 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.53.3 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.43.0 ± 0.6
     Range−11.4% to +8.0%NA−10.0% to +9.8%−11.1% to +4.1%−6.2% to −33.6%−3.1% to −40.3%−27.0% to −53.5%
     P value.789NA.594.016.008.006.002
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD4.3 ± 0.54.2 ± 0.44.1 ± 0.44.0 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.53.4 ± 0.53.1 ± 0.6
     Range−6.7% to +10.1%NA−10.5% to +8.2%−8.3% to +7.8%−10.6% to +7.3%−7.4% to −28.1%−15.7% to −36.7%
     P value.202NA.889.803.169.007.002
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD4.2 ± 0.34.1 ± 0.54.1 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.43.9 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.53.4 ± 0.4
     Range−9.8% to +9.2%NA−9.5% to +8.6%−9.9% to +7.0%−10.6% to +2.8%−11.1% to +7.0%−9.9% to −28.3%
     P value0.783NA.485.256.043.013.009
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD4.1 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.54.2 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.5
     Range−9.2% to +12.4%NA−8.3% to +10.1%−10.5% to +9.1%−10.7% to +9.5%−10.6% to +8.6%−10.5% to +8.5%
     P value.487NA.341.873.306.129.118
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .556, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for MTT values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which MTT values were significantly underestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6:

    PCT MTT values for the ischemic area

    GroupSampling Interval
    0.5 second1 second*2 seconds3 seconds4 seconds5 seconds6 seconds
    1 (30 mL)
     Mean ± SD5.8 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.75.6 ± 0.75.4 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.63.2 ± 0.63.1 ± 0.6
     Range−16.0% to +10.5%NA−17.6% to +7.8%−13.3% to +16.3%−13.6% to −44.3%−32.1% to −67.5%−42.4% to −75.2%
     P value.634NA.168.099.009.002.002
    2 (40 mL)
     Mean ± SD6.0 ± 0.75.8 ± 0.85.6 ± 0.75.4 ± 0.64.1 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.53.4 ± 0.5
     Range−9.2% to +18.1%NA−18.7% to +9.3%−17.6% to +7.3%−9.8% to −36.2%−26.3% to −60.5%−37.9% to −50.5%
     P value.205NA.623.277.004.0020.002
    3 (50 mL)
     Mean ± SD5.8 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.96.0 ± 0.65.7 ± 0.75.3 ± 0.74.3 ± 0.64.3 ± 0.6
     Range−17.1% to +16.5%NA−11.8% to +19.7%−18.2% to +15.5%−22.5% to +8.9%−12.1% to −43.2%−28.1% to −36.0%
     P value.611NA.652.435.057.007.006
    4 (60 mL)
     Mean ± SD6.1 ± 0.86.1 ± 0.85.9 ± 0.66.0 ± 0.75.6 ± 0.75.5 ± 0.64.8 ± 0.6
     Range−19.6% to +11.6%NA−19.5% to +12.3%−18.4% to +12.4%−17.7% to +9.5%−16.1% to +10.35%−13.0% to −33.1%
     P value.677NA.528.649.283.017.008
    • Note.—No significant difference (P = .108, Kruskal-Wallis) was identified among the four groups for MTT values obtained with an interval of 1 second. Range indicates the overestimation or underestimation compared with the reference. Values in boldface indicate the temporal sampling interval thresholds beyond which MTT values were significantly underestimated.

    • * Reference for Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) tests performed in each group. NA indicates not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 7:

    Thresholds beyond which PCT results were significantly different from reference results

    Value and RegionTemporal Sampling Interval (seconds)
    Group 1 (30 mL)Group 2 (40 mL)Group 3 (50 mL)Group 4 (60 mL)
    rCBF
     Healthy hemisphere2334
     Cortical gray matter3345
     White matter2334
     Caudate nucleus3445
     Lenticular nucleus2344
     Ischemic area2334
     Ischemic/healthy ratio2334
    rCBV
     Healthy hemisphere3445
     Cortical gray matter3456
     White matter2334
     Caudate nucleus3345
     Lenticular nucleus3345
     Ischemic area2334
     Ischemic/healthy ratio2334
    MTT
     Healthy hemisphere3456
     Cortical gray matter4556
     White matter4455
     Caudate nucleus3456
     Lenticular nucleus3446
     Ischemic area3345
     Ischemic/healthy ratio3344
    TTP
     Healthy hemisphere3456
     Cortical gray matter4566
     White matter3456
     Caudate nucleus2345
     Lenticular nucleus2445
     Ischemic area2345
     Ischemic/healthy ratio2334
    Global2334
    • Note.—Reference results were calculated from the raw acquisition PCT series (temporal sampling interval of 1 second). The final global threshold for each volume was defined as the minimum temporal sampling interval identified as accurate for any of the four parametric PCT results in any region.

    • View popup
    TABLE 8:

    Imaging protocols for acceptable PCT results

    Bolus (mL)No. of BolusesTotal (mL)Scanning Duration (seconds)Temporal Sampling Interval (seconds)Images per Series (per section)PCT TechniqueMDCT Spatial Coverage (cm)kVpmAsmSvDose-Coverage RatioImage-Quality Ratio
    3026036219Cine4801201.2450.3110.645
    3039036219Cine6801201.8670.3110.645
    4028042315Cine4801200.9830.2460.712
    50210042315Cine4801200.9830.2460.767
    6016048413Toggling-table4801200.8520.2130.850
    • Note.—Parameters in boldface indicate the recommended protocols with optimal dose-coverage ratios.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 5
1 May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic Perfusion CT: Optimizing the Temporal Resolution and Contrast Volume for Calculation of Perfusion CT Parameters in Stroke Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dynamic Perfusion CT: Optimizing the Temporal Resolution and Contrast Volume for Calculation of Perfusion CT Parameters in Stroke Patients
Max Wintermark, Wade S. Smith, Nerissa U. Ko, Marcel Quist, Pierre Schnyder, William P. Dillon
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 720-729;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dynamic Perfusion CT: Optimizing the Temporal Resolution and Contrast Volume for Calculation of Perfusion CT Parameters in Stroke Patients
Max Wintermark, Wade S. Smith, Nerissa U. Ko, Marcel Quist, Pierre Schnyder, William P. Dillon
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2004, 25 (5) 720-729;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Focal Hypoperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke Perfusion CT: Clinical and Radiologic Predictors and Accuracy for Infarct Prediction
  • Optimal Computed Tomographic Perfusion Scan Duration for Assessment of Acute Stroke Lesion Volumes
  • Perfusion Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Strengths and Pitfalls
  • Exposing Hidden Truncation-Related Errors in Acute Stroke Perfusion Imaging
  • Whole-Brain Adaptive 70-kVp Perfusion Imaging with Variable and Extended Sampling Improves Quality and Consistency While Reducing Dose
  • C-Arm CT Measurement of Cerebral Blood Volume and Cerebral Blood Flow Using a Novel High-Speed Acquisition and a Single Intravenous Contrast Injection
  • Can Iterative Reconstruction Improve Imaging Quality for Lower Radiation CT Perfusion? Initial Experience
  • Effects of Increased Image Noise on Image Quality and Quantitative Interpretation in Brain CT Perfusion
  • CT Brain Perfusion Protocol to Eliminate the Need for Selecting a Venous Output Function
  • CT Perfusion Spot Sign Improves Sensitivity for Prediction of Outcome Compared with CTA and Postcontrast CT
  • Effect of Stenting on Cerebral CT Perfusion in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
  • CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of 2-Second and 1-Second Temporal Resolution
  • Radiation dose evaluation in multidetector-row CT imaging for acute stroke with an anthropomorphic phantom
  • Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations
  • Multiphase CT Angiography versus Single-Phase CT Angiography: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose
  • Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT Perfusion in Early Stroke Visualization and Assessment
  • MR Regional Perfusion Imaging: Visualizing Functional Collateral Circulation
  • Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.
  • Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging
  • Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire