Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleBRAIN

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors

Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz and Ibrahim Somuncu
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;
Nail Bulakbasi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Murat Kocaoglu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anar Farzaliyev
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cem Tayfun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taner Ucoz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ibrahim Somuncu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW, et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:214–221
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:791–798
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, et al. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2002;223:11–29
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. Radiology 2002;224:797–803
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Wong JC, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR. Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;14:1147–1157
  6. Su M-Y, Muller A, Lao X, Nalcioglu O. Tumor characterization with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using MR contrast agents of various molecular weights. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:259–269
    PubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41–51
    PubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Brem S, Cotran R, Folkman. J. Tumor angiogenesis: a quantitative method for histological grading. J Natl Cancer Inst 1972;48:347–356
  9. Rampling R, James A, Papanastassiou V. The present and future management of malignant brain tumours: surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(suppl 2):ii24–ii30
  10. Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL, et al. Assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapeutics using MRI: recommendations for appropriate methodology for clinical trials. Br J Radiol 2003;76 (suppl 1):S87–S91
  11. ↵
    Akella NS, Twieg DB, Mikkelsen T, et al. Assessment of brain tumor angiogenesis inhibitors using perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: quality and analysis results of a phase I trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:913–922
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    McKnight TR, von dem Bussche MH, Vigneron DB. Histopathological validation of a three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence. J Neurosurg 2002;97:794–802
    PubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Schwartz RB. Neuroradiology of brain tumors. Neurol Clin 1995;13:723–756
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Bitzer M, Klose U, Nägel T, et al. Echo planar perfusion imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution: methodology and clinical aspects. Eur Radiol 1999;9:221–229
    PubMed
  15. ↵
    Uematsu H, Maeda M, Sadato N, et al. Vascular permeability: quantitative measurement with double echo dynamic MR imaging: theory and clinical application. Radiology 2000;214:912–917
    PubMed
  16. ↵
    Jackson A, Kassner A, Zhu XP, Li KL. Reproducibility of T2* blood volume and vascular tortuosity maps in cerebral gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:510–516
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Barbier EL, Lamalle L, Décorps M. Methodology of brain perfusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:496–520
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR. Noninvasive determination of regional cerebral blood flow in rats using dynamic imaging with Gd (DTPA). Magn Reson Med 1992;25:211–212
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Intera application guide. Release 9. Vol 2: Scan methods. Best, the Netherlands: Philips Medical Systems;2002 :211–217
  20. ↵
    Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea JM, Brady TJ. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:249–265
    PubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of gliomas: comparison between gradient-echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1306–1315
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Kleihues P, Cavenee WK. WHO Classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. IARC, Lyon, France,2000 :9–70
  23. ↵
    Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1989–1998
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:783–789
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Folkman J. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol 2002;29(suppl 16):15–18
  26. ↵
    Cha S, Johnson G, Wadghiri YZ, et al. Dynamic, contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in mouse gliomas: correlation with histopathology. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:848–855
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Pathak AP, Schmainda KM, Ward BD, et al. MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:735–747
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Law M, Yang S, Babb JS, et al. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:746–755
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1479–1486
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Daldrup H, Shames DM, Wendland M, et al. Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:67–78
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:891–899
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, et al. Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1231–1241
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. Oh J, Henry RG, Pirzkall A, et al. Survival analysis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: predictive value of choline-to-n-acetylaspartate index, apparent diffusion coefficient, and relative cerebral blood volume. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:546–554
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. Lee SJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, et al. Perfusion MR imaging in gliomas: comparison with histologic tumor grade. Korean J Radiol 2001;2:1–7
    PubMed
  35. Aronen HJ, Pardo FS, Kennedy DN, et al. High microvascular blood volume is associated with high glucose uptake and tumor angiogenesis in human gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:2189–2200
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Bollen AW, et al. Correlation of microvascular permeability derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic grade and tumor labeling index: a study in human brain tumors. Acad Radiol 2001;8:384–391
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. Provenzale JM, Wang GR, Brenner T, et al. Comparison of permeability in high-grade and low-grade brain tumors using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:711–716
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Ley S, et al. Quantitative estimation of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors: correlation of dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with histopathologic grading. Acad Radiol 2002;(suppl 1):S151–S155
  39. Schmainda KM, Rand SD, Joseph AM, et al. Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1524–1532
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Tropres I, Lamalle L, Peoc’h M, et al. In vivo assessment of tumoral angiogenesis. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:533–541
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Cha S, Tihan T, Crawford F, et al. Differentiation of low-grade oligodendrogliomas from low-grade astrocytomas by using quantitative blood-volume measurements derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:266–273
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, et al. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:715–721
    PubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Chiang IC, Kuo YT, Lu CY, et al. Distinction between high-grade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings. Neuroradiology 2004;46:619–627
    PubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    Kremer S, Grand S, Berger F, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: differentiating melanoma and renal carcinoma metastases from high-grade astrocytomas and other metastases. Neuroradiology 2003;45:44–49
    PubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 9
1 Oct 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz, Ibrahim Somuncu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Perfusion MR Imaging in Primary and Metastatic Solitary Malignant Brain Tumors
Nail Bulakbasi, Murat Kocaoglu, Anar Farzaliyev, Cem Tayfun, Taner Ucoz, Ibrahim Somuncu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2005, 26 (9) 2187-2199;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Histopathologic Findings
    • Grading
    • Differentiation
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Solitary Cerebral Metastases vs. High-grade Gliomas: Usefulness of Two MRI Signs in the Differential Diagnosis
  • Improved Brain Tumor Classification by Sodium MR Imaging: Prediction of IDH Mutation Status and Tumor Progression
  • MRI Grading versus Histology: Predicting Survival of World Health Organization Grade II-IV Astrocytomas
  • The Added Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Cerebral Blood Volume in the Preoperative Grading of Diffuse Gliomas
  • Imaging biomarkers of angiogenesis and the microvascular environment in cerebral tumours
  • Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas: a valuable tool to predict tumour grading?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire