Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
LetterLetter

Endovascular Carotid Stenting in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery: If Yes, Which First?

Gianluca Rigatelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2006, 27 (1) 11-12;
Gianluca Rigatelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

While the debate about the effectiveness of staged or combined surgery for carotid and cardiac disease requiring cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation continues, there is another issue to consider: can carotid stenting replace carotid endatherectomy in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery? In the past, despite an extensive literature on the subject, there has been a failure to identify the correct management of carotid and coronary or cardiac valve disease. Some authors have suggested that stroke at coronary surgery is due to multiple risk factors, one of which is high-grade carotid stenosis, though embolism rather than flow limitation could be the primary mechanism.1 No significant difference in the overall stroke and mortality risk between the various strategies was found, but subgroup analysis suggested that, when carefully selected, patients with less severe cardiac disease do better when surgery is staged, whereas patients with more severe cardiac disease should be treated with combined surgery.2 The increased popularity of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with its the excellent results, especially in high-risk patients, raises the question about the effectiveness of CAS in reducing the stroke risk in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.

Recently some authors have proposed CAS before cardiac surgery, especially in asymptomatic patients.3 Unfortunately, this strategy involves the problem of antiplatelet drug therapy that increases the risk of bleeding after cardiac surgery.4 In my experience, an answer to this problem is an approach to carotid and cardiac disease on the basis of neurologic symptoms and severity of the cardiac disease (Table). Although this strategy has not yet proved to be the most effective in managing combined carotid and cardiac disease, we have not observed any increase in bleeding and have noted a slight decrease in minor and major strokes after surgery in a small preliminary series of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Treatment of carotid and cardiac disease in the author proposal

References

  1. ↵
    Das SK, Brow TD, Pepper J. Continuing controversy in the management of concomitant coronary and carotid disease: an overview. Int J Cardiol 2000;74:47–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Naylor AR, Cuffe RL, Rothwell PM, et al. A systematic review of outcomes following staged and synchronous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:380–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Kihara S, Shimakura T, Tanaka SA, et al. Staged coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous angioplasty for intracranial vascular stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:608–10
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Englberger L, Faeh B, Berdat PA, et al. Impact of clopidogrel in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:96–101
    Abstract/FREE Full Text

Reply:

There are few subjects as singularly controversial as the treatment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis. Conversely, treatment of coronary artery stenosis has an established history, though recent data indicate that this therapy is more useful for prevention of angina than of sudden cardiac death. Carotid artery stenosis associated with coronary atherosclerotic disease is increasing in frequency with the aging of the general population, and clinicians are faced with how best to manage this coexistent problem. Carotid stenting offers a therapeutic option for just such patients: those with associated carotid and coronary atherostenosis. Despite a large volume of data present in the literature, specific treatment indications relating to surgical and/or endovascular options for both, or either, remain unclear and/or controversial.

In Canada, a recent countrywide evaluation found that 0.51% of CABG procedures were combined with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The adjusted stroke and death rate was 2.67-fold greater in the combined CEA-CABG group compared to CABG alone,1 a rate that would seem difficult to justify. There is no doubt that treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis is necessary and is, moreover, required very soon after the signal event.2,3 Treatment by any method for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is only statistically beneficial in the long term (ie, several years).4 Treatment of coronary artery stenosis by bypass grafting is rarely “event” dependent; rather, it is “severity” dependent. Currently, with the lack of definitive benefit for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis by means of carotid artery stenting (CAS), early indication from CREST that CAS is harmful for patients >80 years of age, and proof that CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not beneficial for anyone >75 years of age,5 recommending CAS for asymptomatic patients prior to CABG with the indication being “pre-CABG” would be questionable. It would seem most appropriate to treat the symptomatic territory first (coronary or carotid) and reserve “combined” procedures for patients with critical stenosis associated with symptoms in both territories. Further study is required before definitive therapeutic recommendations should be made for the clinical situation of concurrent carotid and coronary atherosclerotic stenosis.

References

  1. ↵
    Hill MD, Shrive FM, Kennedy J, et al. Simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery in Canada. Neurology 2005;64:1435–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. Timing of TIAs preceding stroke: time window for prevention is very short. Neurology 2005 :64:817–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Sex difference in the effect of time from symptoms to surgery on benefit from carotid endarterectomy for transient ischemic attack and nondisabling stroke. Stroke 2004;35:2855–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Rothwell PM, Goldstein LB. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: asymptomatic carotid surgery trial. Stroke 2004;35:2425–27
    FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491–502
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 1
January, 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endovascular Carotid Stenting in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery: If Yes, Which First?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Endovascular Carotid Stenting in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery: If Yes, Which First?
Gianluca Rigatelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 11-12;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Endovascular Carotid Stenting in Patients Scheduled for Cardiac Surgery: If Yes, Which First?
Gianluca Rigatelli
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2006, 27 (1) 11-12;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Acute Stroke Imaging in Transfer Patients Who Received Recent Intravenous Iodinated Contrast at an Outside Facility: An Unrecognized Problem That Deserves More Attention
  • Primary Angiitis of the CNS with Unremarkable Vessel Wall MR Imaging: How the “T1 Shinethrough” Effect on SWI Adds to the Detection of Gadolinium Enhancement of Small Intraparenchymal Brain Vessels
  • Reply:
Show more LETTERS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2020 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2021 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire